These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26293017)

  • 1. First Look: One Year Since Inception of Regional Share 35 Policy.
    Annamalai A; Ayoub W; Sundaram V; Klein A
    Transplant Proc; 2015; 47(6):1585-90. PubMed ID: 26293017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. End-stage liver disease patients with MELD >40 have higher waitlist mortality compared to Status 1A patients.
    Ahn J; Bhuket T; Mosadeghi S; Frenette C; Liu B; Wong RJ
    Hepatol Int; 2016 Sep; 10(5):838-46. PubMed ID: 27221700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Candidates with High MELD and Severe Hepatic Encephalopathy.
    Gadiparthi C; Cholankeril G; Yoo ER; Hu M; Wong RJ; Ahmed A
    Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Jun; 63(6):1647-1653. PubMed ID: 29611079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in Characteristics of Patients Listed for Liver Transplantation Will Lead to Higher Rates of Waitlist Removal Due to Clinical Deterioration.
    Yi Z; Mayorga ME; Orman ES; Wheeler SB; Hayashi PH; Barritt AS
    Transplantation; 2017 Oct; 101(10):2368-2374. PubMed ID: 28858174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of broader regional sharing of livers: 2-year results of "Share 35".
    Edwards EB; Harper AM; Hirose R; Mulligan DC
    Liver Transpl; 2016 Apr; 22(4):399-409. PubMed ID: 26890858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improvement in the Outcomes of MELD ≥ 40 Liver Transplantation: An Analysis of 207 Consecutive Transplants in a Highly Competitive DSA.
    Nekrasov V; Matsuoka L; Kaur N; Pita A; Whang G; Cao S; Groshen S; Alexopoulos S
    Transplantation; 2017 Oct; 101(10):2360-2367. PubMed ID: 28319564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes for liver transplant candidates listed with low model for end-stage liver disease score.
    Kwong AJ; Lai JC; Dodge JL; Roberts JP
    Liver Transpl; 2015 Nov; 21(11):1403-9. PubMed ID: 26289624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of Allocating Livers for Transplantation Based on Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium Scores on Patient Outcomes.
    Nagai S; Chau LC; Schilke RE; Safwan M; Rizzari M; Collins K; Yoshida A; Abouljoud MS; Moonka D
    Gastroenterology; 2018 Nov; 155(5):1451-1462.e3. PubMed ID: 30056096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should All Status 1A Patients Be Prioritized Over High MELD Patients? Concept of Risk Stratification in Extremely Ill Liver Transplant Recipients.
    Safwan M; Nwagu U; Collins K; Abouljoud M; Nagai S
    Transplantation; 2019 Oct; 103(10):2121-2129. PubMed ID: 30747840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved retransplant outcomes: early evidence of the share35 impact.
    Brooks JT; Koizumi N; Neglia E; Gdoura B; Wong TW; Kwon C; Smith TE; Ortiz J
    HPB (Oxford); 2018 Jul; 20(7):649-657. PubMed ID: 29500002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Liver transplantation after share 35: Impact on pretransplant and posttransplant costs and mortality.
    Nicolas CT; Nyberg SL; Heimbach JK; Watt K; Chen HS; Hathcock MA; Kremers WK
    Liver Transpl; 2017 Jan; 23(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 27658200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Share 35 Policy on Liver Transplantation Outcomes for Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.
    Zhang Y; Boktour MR
    Prog Transplant; 2019 Sep; 29(3):248-253. PubMed ID: 31146627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Liver Simulated Allocation Modeling: Were the Predictions Accurate for Share 35?
    Goel A; Kim WR; Pyke J; Schladt DP; Kasiske BL; Snyder JJ; Lake JR; Israni AK
    Transplantation; 2018 May; 102(5):769-774. PubMed ID: 29309379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Share 21 model in liver transplantation: Impact on waitlist outcomes.
    Nagai S; Chau LC; Kitajima T; Yeddula S; Collins K; Rizzari M; Yoshida A; Abouljoud MS; Moonka D
    Am J Transplant; 2020 Aug; 20(8):2184-2197. PubMed ID: 32155314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reassessing the survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation: retrospective cohort study.
    Malamon JS; Kaplan B; Jackson WE; Saben JL; Schold JD; Pomfret EA; Pomposelli JJ
    Int J Surg; 2023 Sep; 109(9):2714-2720. PubMed ID: 37226874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of the MELD allocation after its implementation in liver transplantation.
    Benckert C; Quante M; Thelen A; Bartels M; Laudi S; Berg T; Kaisers U; Jonas S
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2011 Jul; 46(7-8):941-8. PubMed ID: 21443420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in liver acceptance patterns after implementation of Share 35.
    Washburn K; Harper A; Baker T; Edwards E
    Liver Transpl; 2016 Feb; 22(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 26437266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do Social Determinants Define "Too Sick" to Transplant in Patients With End-stage Liver Disease?
    Bababekov YJ; Hung YC; Chang DC; Rickert CG; Adler JT; Bethea E; Pomfret EA; Pomposelli JJ; Yeh H
    Transplantation; 2020 Feb; 104(2):280-284. PubMed ID: 31335769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Update on the management of the liver transplant patient.
    Kwong AJ; Fix OK
    Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 31(3):224-32. PubMed ID: 25774445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of rapid Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) increases for liver transplant registrant prioritization after MELD-Na and Share 35, an evaluation using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing.
    Brock GN; Washburn K; Marvin MR
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223053. PubMed ID: 31581270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.