These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26294170)

  • 1. Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Liu Z; Li X; Li W; Yang Y; Tao Y; Yao Y
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Nov; 131(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 26294170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
    Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Minig L; Zanagnolo V; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Colombo N; Maggioni A
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1372-7. PubMed ID: 27247200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: comparison with early stage disease.
    Vitobello D; Siesto G; Pirovano C; Ieda N
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jan; 39(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 23122543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by robotic radical hysterectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a multi-institution study.
    Vizza E; Corrado G; Zanagnolo V; Tomaselli T; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Maggioni A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 24589412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic and Abdominal Surgery in the Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Saltari M; Mancini E; Sindico S; Vici P; Sergi D; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Pomati G; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 26825826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Cai J; Yang L; Dong W; Wang H; Xiong Z; Wang Z
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 132(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 26434669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Liu Z; Li X; Tao Y; Li W; Yang Y; Yao Y; Zhu T
    Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():54-8. PubMed ID: 26632655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radical Hysterectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Bulky-Size Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis between the Robotic and Abdominal Approaches.
    Liu CH; Lee YC; Lin JC; Chan IS; Lee NR; Chang WH; Liu WM; Wang PH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(20):. PubMed ID: 31614465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nerve-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy versus nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in early-stage (FIGO IA2-IB) cervical cancer: a comparative study on feasibility and outcome.
    van Gent MD; van den Haak LW; Gaarenstroom KN; Peters AA; van Poelgeest MI; Trimbos JB; de Kroon CD
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):735-43. PubMed ID: 24651626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy After Concomitant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Phase II Study.
    Gallotta V; Chiantera V; Conte C; Vizzielli G; Fagotti A; Nero C; Costantini B; Lucidi A; Cicero C; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 27666513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients.
    Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Uccella S; Bogani G; Sturla D; Serati M; Bolis P
    Surg Innov; 2013 Oct; 20(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 23339145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic single site radical hysterectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancers.
    Vizza E; Chiofalo B; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Zampa A; Bufalo A; Corrado G
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):e2. PubMed ID: 29185260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multi-institutional cohort study.
    Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Ditto A; Vizza E; Malzoni M; Raspagliesi F; Uccella S; Corrado G; Cosentino F; Gotsch F; Martinelli F; Franchi M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):2007-15. PubMed ID: 23224830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there a role for postoperative treatment in patients with stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery? An Italian multicenter retrospective study.
    Landoni F; Sartori E; Maggino T; Zola P; Zanagnolo V; Cosio S; Ferrari F; Piovano E; Gadducci A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Mar; 132(3):611-7. PubMed ID: 24342439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tailored radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Sakuragi N; Kaneuchi M; Kato T; Shimada C; Todo Y; Ihira K; Nozaki A; Umazume T; Konno Y; Mitamura T; Kobayashi N; Murakami G; Watari H
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1136-1142. PubMed ID: 32522774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How often parametrial involvement leads to post-operative adjuvant treatment in locally advanced cervical cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and type C radical hysterectomy?
    Martinelli F; Bogani G; Ditto A; Carcangiu M; Papadia A; Lecce F; Chiappa V; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1089-96. PubMed ID: 25890492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.