These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26294206)

  • 1. Assessing the learning curve of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Linder BJ; Anand M; Weaver AL; Woelk JL; Klingele CJ; Trabuco EC; Occhino JA; Gebhart JB
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Feb; 27(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 26294206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpo(recto)pexy: a cumulative sum analysis.
    van Zanten F; Schraffordt Koops SE; Pasker-De Jong PCM; Lenters E; Schreuder HWR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):483.e1-483.e11. PubMed ID: 31152711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single Port Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: Our Experience With the First 25 Cases.
    Matanes E; Lauterbach R; Mustafa-Mikhail S; Amit A; Wiener Z; Lowenstein L
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):e14-e18. PubMed ID: 28134702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomic Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy and Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy at a Tertiary Care Institution at Initial Adaptation of the Procedure.
    Prendergast E; Silver H; Johnson LL; Simon M; Feinglass J; Kielb S; Hairston J; Lewicky-Gaupp C
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 26680565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors associated with intraoperative conversion during robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Linder BJ; Chow GK; Hertzig LL; Clifton M; Elliott DS
    Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 26005974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic versus vaginal urogynecologic surgery: a retrospective cohort study of perioperative complications in elderly women.
    Robinson BL; Parnell BA; Sandbulte JT; Geller EJ; Connolly A; Matthews CA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2013; 19(4):230-7. PubMed ID: 23797528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning curves and perioperative outcomes of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy on two different da Vinci
    Oh S; Bae N; Cho HW; Park YJ; Kim YJ; Shin JH
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):1457-1462. PubMed ID: 36757563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Impact of Obesity on Intraoperative Complications and Prolapse Recurrence After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Turner L; Lavelle E; Lowder JL; Shepherd JP
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 27054791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative complications of robotic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.
    Anand M; Woelk JL; Weaver AL; Trabuco EC; Klingele CJ; Gebhart JB
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1193-200. PubMed ID: 24715099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic sacrocolpopexy performance and cumulative summation analysis.
    Myers EM; Geller EJ; Connolly A; Bowling JM; Matthews CA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 24566210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy.
    Woelk JL; Casiano ER; Weaver AL; Gostout BS; Trabuco EC; Gebhart JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 23262932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of Case Order on Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: Do Surgeons Need a Warm-Up?
    Lavelle ES; Turner LC; Shepherd JP
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(4):272-275. PubMed ID: 28106657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Establishing the Learning Curve of Robotic Sacral Colpopexy in a Start-up Robotics Program.
    Sharma S; Calixte R; Finamore PS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 26342449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perioperative Complications and Cost of Vaginal, Open Abdominal, and Robotic Surgery for Apical Vaginal Vault Prolapse.
    Anand M; Weaver AL; Fruth KM; Borah BJ; Klingele CJ; Gebhart JB
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 27682746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of surgical start time in patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Jallad K; Barber MD; Ridgeway B; Paraiso MF; Unger CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1535-9. PubMed ID: 27026142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy learning curve on operative time, perioperative complications and short term results.
    Vandendriessche D; Giraudet G; Lucot JP; Behal H; Cosson M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():84-9. PubMed ID: 26094181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.