These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26295178)

  • 21. Influence of radiant exposure and repetition rate in infrared neural stimulation with near-infrared lasers.
    Alemzadeh-Ansari MJ; Ansari MA; Zakeri M; Haghjoo M
    Lasers Med Sci; 2019 Oct; 34(8):1555-1566. PubMed ID: 30887233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selectivity of neural stimulation in the auditory system: a comparison of optic and electric stimuli.
    Izzo AD; Suh E; Pathria J; Walsh JT; Whitlon DS; Richter CP
    J Biomed Opt; 2007; 12(2):021008. PubMed ID: 17477715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. II. Comparison of fixed amplitude with amplitude modulated stimuli.
    Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):147-57. PubMed ID: 9367237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Channel Interaction During Infrared Light Stimulation in the Cochlea.
    Agarwal A; Tan X; Xu Y; Richter CP
    Lasers Surg Med; 2021 Sep; 53(7):986-997. PubMed ID: 33476051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.
    Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():50-65. PubMed ID: 27521841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Radiant energy required for infrared neural stimulation.
    Tan X; Rajguru S; Young H; Xia N; Stock SR; Xiao X; Richter CP
    Sci Rep; 2015 Aug; 5():13273. PubMed ID: 26305106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stimulus level effects on neural excitation and eCAP amplitude.
    Westen AA; Dekker DM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):166-76. PubMed ID: 21664959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency.
    Raggio MW; Schreiner CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 72(5):2334-59. PubMed ID: 7884463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array.
    Jolly CN; Clopton BM; Spelman FA; Lineaweaver SK
    Med Prog Technol; 1997; 21 Suppl():13-23. PubMed ID: 9413824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users].
    Zhu X; Cao K; Pan T; Yang H; Wang Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab.
    Bahmer A; Peter O; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug; 191(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 20558202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Acute damage threshold for infrared neural stimulation of the cochlea: functional and histological evaluation.
    Goyal V; Rajguru S; Matic AI; Stock SR; Richter CP
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2012 Nov; 295(11):1987-99. PubMed ID: 23044730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optical cochlear implants: evaluation of surgical approach and laser parameters in cats.
    Rajguru SM; Matic AI; Robinson AM; Fishman AJ; Moreno LE; Bradley A; Vujanovic I; Breen J; Wells JD; Bendett M; Richter CP
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):102-11. PubMed ID: 20603207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Rubinstein JT
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 15732375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of electrical pulse shape on AVCN unit responses to cochlear stimulation.
    Wiler JA; Clopton BM; Mikhail MA
    Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 39(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 2753830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Design and testing of low intensity laser biostimulator.
    Valchinov ES; Pallikarakis NE
    Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Jan; 4():5. PubMed ID: 15649327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Suppression of the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response by electrical stimulation in the cochlea of the guinea pig.
    Stronks HC; Versnel H; Prijs VF; Klis SF
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 19840841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Infrared neural stimulation fails to evoke neural activity in the deaf guinea pig cochlea.
    Thompson AC; Fallon JB; Wise AK; Wade SA; Shepherd RK; Stoddart PR
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():46-53. PubMed ID: 25796297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Suppressing effect of substance P receptor antagonist on sound evoked potentials recorded from the guinea pig cochlea.
    Liang X; Wang Z; Zhang L; Ni D
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1999 Feb; 112(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 11593577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.