1047 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26295607)
1. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic Change Complex Recorded in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
Jeon EK; Mussoi BS; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(3):151-157. PubMed ID: 36450234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Within- and across-frequency temporal processing and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
Blankenship CM; Meinzen-Derr J; Zhang F
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275772. PubMed ID: 36227872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Acoustic Change Complex Compared to Hearing Performance in Unilaterally and Bilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.
van Heteren JAA; Vonck BMD; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H; Lammers MJW
Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1783-1799. PubMed ID: 35696186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.
Billings CJ; Penman TM; McMillan GP; Ellis EM
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):710-22. PubMed ID: 26502191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) and behavioural measures of auditory function in a child with a single-sided deafness.
Cañete OM; Purdy SC; Neeff M; Brown CRS; Thorne PR
Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Nov; 18(6):335-346. PubMed ID: 28922984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinically recorded cortical auditory evoked potentials from paediatric cochlear implant users fitted with electrically elicited stapedius reflex thresholds.
Kosaner J; Van Dun B; Yigit O; Gultekin M; Bayguzina S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():100-112. PubMed ID: 29605337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Analysis of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential in Cochlear Implant Users.
Távora-Vieira D; Mandruzzato G; Polak M; Truong B; Stutley A
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1755-1769. PubMed ID: 34172688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of Patient Factors on Objective Cochlear Implant Verification Using Acoustic Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials.
Bogdanov C; Mulders WHAM; Goulios H; Távora-Vieira D
Audiol Neurootol; 2024; 29(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 37690449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech perception and cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant users with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders.
Alvarenga KF; Amorim RB; Agostinho-Pesse RS; Costa OA; Nascimento LT; Bevilacqua MC
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1332-8. PubMed ID: 22796193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded Directly Through the Cochlear Implant in Cochlear Implant Recipients: a Feasibility Study.
Attias J; HabibAllah S; Aditya Tarigoppula VS; Glick H; Chen C; Kanthaiah K; Litvak L
Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 35245922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N
Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Restoration of cortical symmetry and binaural function: Cortical auditory evoked responses in adult cochlear implant users with single sided deafness.
Wedekind A; Rajan G; Van Dun B; Távora-Vieira D
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227371. PubMed ID: 31935234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cortical auditory evoked potentials as an objective measure of behavioral thresholds in cochlear implant users.
Visram AS; Innes-Brown H; El-Deredy W; McKay CM
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():35-42. PubMed ID: 25959269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do the minimum and maximum comfortable stimulation levels influence the cortical potential latencies or the speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users?
Martins KVC; Goffi-Gomez MVS; Tsuji RK; Bento RF
Hear Res; 2021 May; 404():108206. PubMed ID: 33677193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
