BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26296406)

  • 1. Considerations in the use of reflective writing for student assessment: issues of reliability and validity.
    Moniz T; Arntfield S; Miller K; Lingard L; Watling C; Regehr G
    Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 49(9):901-8. PubMed ID: 26296406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fostering and evaluating reflective capacity in medical education: developing the REFLECT rubric for assessing reflective writing.
    Wald HS; Borkan JM; Taylor JS; Anthony D; Reis SP
    Acad Med; 2012 Jan; 87(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 22104060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical thinking evaluation in reflective writing: Development and testing of Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Reflection).
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Midwifery; 2017 Nov; 54():73-80. PubMed ID: 28866350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Added value of assessing medical students' reflective writings in communication skills training: a longitudinal study in four academic centres.
    Ament Giuliani Franco C; Franco RS; Cecilio-Fernandes D; Severo M; Ferreira MA; de Carvalho-Filho MA
    BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e038898. PubMed ID: 33158823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An analysis of reflective writing early in the medical curriculum: The relationship between reflective capacity and academic achievement.
    Ottenberg AL; Pasalic D; Bui GT; Pawlina W
    Med Teach; 2016 Jul; 38(7):724-9. PubMed ID: 26609870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grading reflective essays: the construct validity and reliability of a newly developed Tool- GRE-9.
    Makarem NN; Rahme DV; Brome D; Saab BR
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Nov; 23(1):870. PubMed ID: 37974119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation of MCQ and SEQ scores in written undergraduate ophthalmology assessment.
    Mahmood H
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 25772958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. LUCAS: a theoretically informed instrument to assess clinical communication in objective structured clinical examinations.
    Huntley CD; Salmon P; Fisher PL; Fletcher I; Young B
    Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 46(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 22324526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring critical thinking in pre-registration midwifery students: A multi-method approach.
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Feb; 61():169-174. PubMed ID: 29216601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method for assessing reflective journal writing.
    Plack MM; Driscoll M; Blissett S; McKenna R; Plack TP
    J Allied Health; 2005; 34(4):199-208. PubMed ID: 16529182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A modified tool for "reflective practice" in medical education: Adaptation of the REFLECT rubric in Persian.
    Daryazadeh S; Yamani N; Adibi P
    J Educ Health Promot; 2020; 9():24. PubMed ID: 32154319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring medical students' professional competencies in a problem-based curriculum: a reliability study.
    Kassab SE; Du X; Toft E; Cyprian F; Al-Moslih A; Schmidt H; Hamdy H; Abu-Hijleh M
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):155. PubMed ID: 31113457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Four-Week Reflective Writing Program in the Psychiatry Clerkship: Testing Effects on Reflective Capacity.
    Whitmore CA; Sakai J; Mikulich-Gilbertson SK; Davies RD
    Acad Psychiatry; 2019 Apr; 43(2):171-174. PubMed ID: 29704195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-rater reliability of a reflective rubric to assess pharmacy students' reflective thinking.
    Lucas C; Bosnic-Anticevich S; Schneider CR; Bartimote-Aufflick K; McEntee M; Smith L
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2017 Nov; 9(6):989-995. PubMed ID: 29233396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and testing of an objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) to assess socio-cultural dimensions of patient safety competency.
    Ginsburg LR; Tregunno D; Norton PG; Smee S; de Vries I; Sebok SS; VanDenKerkhof EG; Luctkar-Flude M; Medves J
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Mar; 24(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 25398630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do writing and storytelling skill influence assessment of reflective ability in medical students' written reflections?
    Aronson L; Niehaus B; DeVries CD; Siegel JR; O'Sullivan PS
    Acad Med; 2010 Oct; 85(10 Suppl):S29-32. PubMed ID: 20881698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing medical student competency in communication in the pre-clinical phase: objective structured video exam and SP exam.
    Karabilgin OS; Vatansever K; Caliskan SA; Durak Hİ
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jun; 87(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 22169634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The validity and reliability of the sixth-year internal medical examination administered at the King Abdulaziz University Medical College.
    Fallatah HI; Tekian A; Park YS; Al Shawa L
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Feb; 15():10. PubMed ID: 25638149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the validity of a scenario-based questionnaire to assess the ethical sensitivity of undergraduate medical students.
    Lohfeld L; Goldie J; Schwartz L; Eva K; Cotton P; Morrison J; Kulamakan K; Norman G; Wood T
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(8):635-42. PubMed ID: 22830320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The IDEA Assessment Tool: Assessing the Reporting, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Decision-Making Skills Demonstrated in Medical Students' Hospital Admission Notes.
    Baker EA; Ledford CH; Fogg L; Way DP; Park YS
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 25893938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.