These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26296623)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of decision maker preferences for equity/efficiency attributes in reimbursement decisions in three European countries.
    Baji P; García-Goñi M; Gulácsi L; Mentzakis E; Paolucci F
    Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Sep; 17(7):791-9. PubMed ID: 26296623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Priority setting in the Austrian healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment and implications for mental health.
    Mentzakis E; Paolucci F; Rubicko G
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2014 Jun; 17(2):61-73. PubMed ID: 25153094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency and equity considerations in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel.
    Shmueli A; Golan O; Paolucci F; Mentzakis E
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017; 6():18. PubMed ID: 28373904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency.
    Mirelman A; Mentzakis E; Kinter E; Paolucci F; Fordham R; Ozawa S; Ferraz M; Baltussen R; Niessen LW
    Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 22583464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equity and efficiency preferences of health policy makers in China--a stated preference analysis.
    Paolucci F; Mentzakis E; Defechereux T; Niessen LW
    Health Policy Plan; 2015 Oct; 30(8):1059-66. PubMed ID: 25500745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dear policy maker: have you made up your mind? A discrete choice experiment among policy makers and other health professionals.
    Koopmanschap MA; Stolk EA; Koolman X
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Apr; 26(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20392324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining the attitudes and preferences of health care decision-makers in relation to access, equity and cost-effectiveness: a discrete choice experiment.
    Ratcliffe J; Bekker HL; Dolan P; Edlin R
    Health Policy; 2009 Apr; 90(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18937994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Equity Weights for Priority Setting in Healthcare: Severity, Age, or Both?
    Reckers-Droog V; van Exel J; Brouwer W
    Value Health; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 31806201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Societal Preferences for Interventions with the Same Efficiency: Assessment and Application to Decision Making.
    Shiroiwa T; Saito S; Shimozuma K; Kodama S; Noto S; Fukuda T
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 14(3):375-85. PubMed ID: 26940671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Priority setting in the German healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment.
    Meusel V; Mentzakis E; Baji P; Fiorentini G; Paolucci F
    Int J Health Econ Manag; 2023 Sep; 23(3):411-431. PubMed ID: 37184821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision-makers' preferences for approving new medicines in Wales: a discrete-choice experiment with assessment of external validity.
    Linley WG; Hughes DA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Apr; 31(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 23516033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Balancing equity and efficiency in health priorities in Ghana: the use of multicriteria decision analysis.
    Jehu-Appiah C; Baltussen R; Acquah C; Aikins M; d'Almeida SA; Bosu WK; Koolman X; Lauer J; Osei D; Adjei S
    Value Health; 2008 Dec; 11(7):1081-7. PubMed ID: 19602214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
    Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are some QALYs more equal than others?
    van de Wetering EJ; van Exel NJ; Rose JM; Hoefman RJ; Brouwer WB
    Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Mar; 17(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 25479937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Societal preferences for distributive justice in the allocation of health care resources: a latent class discrete choice experiment.
    Skedgel C; Wailoo A; Akehurst R
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 25145575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.
    Whitty JA; Lancsar E; Rixon K; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
    Patient; 2014; 7(4):365-86. PubMed ID: 24872225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health Preference Research in Europe: A Review of Its Use in Marketing Authorization, Reimbursement, and Pricing Decisions-Report of the ISPOR Stated Preference Research Special Interest Group.
    Marsh K; van Til JA; Molsen-David E; Juhnke C; Hawken N; Oehrlein EM; Choi YC; Duenas A; Greiner W; Haas K; Hiligsmann M; Hockley KS; Ivlev I; Liu F; Ostermann J; Poder T; Poon JL; Muehlbacher A
    Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):831-841. PubMed ID: 32762984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are pricing and reimbursement decision-making criteria aligned with public preferences regarding allocation principles in the Polish healthcare sector?
    Kolasa K
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Oct; 14(5):751-62. PubMed ID: 25052370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do the equity-efficiency preferences of the Israeli Basket Committee match those of Israeli health policy makers?
    Shmueli A
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017; 6():20. PubMed ID: 28469840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determining priority for liver transplantation: a comparison of cost per QALY and discrete choice experiment-generated public preferences.
    Ratcliffe J; Buxton M; Young T; Longworth L
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2005; 4(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 16466276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.