These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma. Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; William Jordan T; Delahunt B Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 16931953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High WHO/ISUP Grade and Unfavorable Architecture, Rather Than Typing of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma, May Be Associated With Worse Prognosis. Yang C; Shuch B; Kluger H; Humphrey PA; Adeniran AJ Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 May; 44(5):582-593. PubMed ID: 32101890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Verification of the International Society of Urological Pathology recommendations in Japanese patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Kim H; Inomoto C; Uchida T; Furuya H; Komiyama T; Kajiwara H; Kobayashi H; Nakamura N; Miyajima A Int J Oncol; 2018 Apr; 52(4):1139-1148. PubMed ID: 29532874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence. Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: validation of World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology grading. Dagher J; Delahunt B; Rioux-Leclercq N; Egevad L; Srigley JR; Coughlin G; Dunglinson N; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; Malone G; Martin B; Preston J; Pokorny M; Wood S; Yaxley J; Samaratunga H Histopathology; 2017 Dec; 71(6):918-925. PubMed ID: 28718911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Type II papillary histology predicts poor outcome in patients with renal cell carcinoma and vena cava thrombus. Kim KH; You D; Jeong IG; Kwon TW; Cho YM; Hong JH; Ahn H; Kim CS BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E673-8. PubMed ID: 22973869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of type I and II papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and clear cell RCC. Waldert M; Haitel A; Marberger M; Katzenbeisser D; Ozsoy M; Stadler E; Remzi M BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1381-4. PubMed ID: 18782311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Cleveland Clinic experience with papillary (chromophil) renal cell carcinoma: clinical outcome with histopathological correlation. Chow GK; Myles J; Novick AC Can J Urol; 2001 Apr; 8(2):1223-8. PubMed ID: 11375785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Morphological subtyping of papillary renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. Yamashita S; Ioritani N; Oikawa K; Aizawa M; Endoh M; Arai Y Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):679-83. PubMed ID: 17681054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of clinicopathologic parameters and oncologic outcomes between type 1 and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma. Le X; Wang XB; Zhao H; Chen RF; Ge P BMC Urol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):148. PubMed ID: 32933514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histologic subtype needs to be considered after partial nephrectomy in patients with pathologic T1a renal cell carcinoma: papillary vs. clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Yoo S; You D; Jeong IG; Song C; Hong B; Hong JH; Ahn H; Kim CS J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Sep; 143(9):1845-1851. PubMed ID: 28451753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tumor Necrosis Adds Prognostically Significant Information to Grade in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Study of 842 Consecutive Cases From a Single Institution. Khor LY; Dhakal HP; Jia X; Reynolds JP; McKenney JK; Rini BI; Magi-Galluzzi C; Przybycin CG Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Sep; 40(9):1224-31. PubMed ID: 27428737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tumour-associated macrophages might represent a favourable prognostic indicator in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma. Hutterer GC; Pichler M; Chromecki TF; Strini KA; Klatte T; Pummer K; Remzi M; Mannweiler S; Zigeuner R Histopathology; 2013 Sep; 63(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 23802739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: the impact of tumor grade on outcome. Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Sukov WR; Thompson RH; Leibovich BC Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 22367296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival analysis of 130 patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility of type 1 and type 2 subclassification. Pignot G; Elie C; Conquy S; Vieillefond A; Flam T; Zerbib M; Debré B; Amsellem-Ouazana D Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 17275070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics of papillary renal cell carcinoma with emphasis on subtyping. Alomari AK; Nettey OS; Singh D; Kluger H; Adeniran AJ Hum Pathol; 2015 Oct; 46(10):1418-26. PubMed ID: 26239624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: meaning of histological typing and multifocality. Mejean A; Hopirtean V; Bazin JP; Larousserie F; Benoit H; Chrétien Y; Thiounn N; Dufour B J Urol; 2003 Sep; 170(3):764-7. PubMed ID: 12913693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Architectural Patterns are a Relevant Morphologic Grading System for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Prognosis Assessment: Comparisons With WHO/ISUP Grade and Integrated Staging Systems. Verine J; Colin D; Nheb M; Prapotnich D; Ploussard G; Cathelineau X; Desgrandchamps F; Mongiat-Artus P; Feugeas JP Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Apr; 42(4):423-441. PubMed ID: 29356723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]