These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26298185)

  • 1. Statistical monitoring of data quality and consistency in the Stomach Cancer Adjuvant Multi-institutional Trial Group Trial.
    Timmermans C; Doffagne E; Venet D; Desmet L; Legrand C; Burzykowski T; Buyse M
    Gastric Cancer; 2016 Jan; 19(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 26298185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of atypical data in multicenter clinical trials using unsupervised statistical monitoring.
    Trotta L; Kabeya Y; Buyse M; Doffagne E; Venet D; Desmet L; Burzykowski T; Tsuburaya A; Yoshida K; Miyashita Y; Morita S; Sakamoto J; Praveen P; Oba K
    Clin Trials; 2019 Oct; 16(5):512-522. PubMed ID: 31331195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A statistical approach to central monitoring of data quality in clinical trials.
    Venet D; Doffagne E; Burzykowski T; Beckers F; Tellier Y; Genevois-Marlin E; Becker U; Bee V; Wilson V; Legrand C; Buyse M
    Clin Trials; 2012 Dec; 9(6):705-13. PubMed ID: 22684241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Hercule Poirot of clinical research.
    Sakamoto J
    Gastric Cancer; 2016 Jan; 19(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 26482151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data-driven risk identification in phase III clinical trials using central statistical monitoring.
    Timmermans C; Venet D; Burzykowski T
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Feb; 21(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 26233672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian analysis of institutional effects in a multicenter cancer clinical trial.
    Gray RJ
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):244-53. PubMed ID: 8086608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Central statistical monitoring: detecting fraud in clinical trials.
    Pogue JM; Devereaux PJ; Thorlund K; Yusuf S
    Clin Trials; 2013 Apr; 10(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 23283577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized clinical trial: myths around elementary statistical principles.
    Edler L; Kopp-Schneider A
    Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):551-6. PubMed ID: 14709929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size calculation for multicenter randomized trial: taking the center effect into account.
    Vierron E; Giraudeau B
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 17188941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empirical shrinkage estimator for consistency assessment of treatment effects in multi-regional clinical trials.
    Quan H; Li M; Shih WJ; Ouyang SP; Chen J; Zhang J; Zhao PL
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(10):1691-706. PubMed ID: 22855311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current status of a randomized controlled trial examining laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Japan.
    Katai H
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2015 May; 8(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 25676458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Many multicenter trials had few events per center, requiring analysis via random-effects models or GEEs.
    Kahan BC; Harhay MO
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1504-11. PubMed ID: 25985892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Introduction to the statistical aspects of planning clinical oncologic phase III studies].
    Sylvester R; Minder CE
    Urologe A; 1995 Sep; 34(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 7483152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the performance of methods for central statistical monitoring of a binary or continuous outcome in multi-center trials: A simulation study.
    Ge L; Wang Z; Liu CC; Childress S; Wildfire J; Wu G
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2024 Aug; 143():107580. PubMed ID: 38796099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A note on statistical power in multi-site randomized trials with multiple treatments at each site.
    Liu XS
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):231-47. PubMed ID: 23710937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Internet based multi-institutional clinical research: a convenient and secure option.
    Lallas CD; Preminger GM; Pearle MS; Leveillee RJ; Lingeman JE; Schwope JP; Pietrow PK; Auge BK
    J Urol; 2004 May; 171(5):1880-5. PubMed ID: 15076298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new population-enrichment strategy to improve efficiency of placebo-controlled clinical trials of antidepressant drugs.
    Merlo-Pich E; Alexander RC; Fava M; Gomeni R
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Nov; 88(5):634-42. PubMed ID: 20861834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing for consistency in a single multicenter trial.
    Chinchilli VM; Bortey EB
    J Biopharm Stat; 1991; 1(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 1844692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detecting qualitative interactions in clinical trials with binary responses.
    Kitsche A
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(5):309-15. PubMed ID: 25049176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.