226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26298536)
1. Do manual cutting guides for total knee arthroplasty introduce systematic error?
Hohmann E; Tetsworth K
Int Orthop; 2016 Feb; 40(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 26298536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Navigated total knee arthroplasty: is it error-free?
Chua KH; Chen Y; Lingaraj K
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2014 Mar; 22(3):643-9. PubMed ID: 24061715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cutting error of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty by use of a navigation system.
Nakahara H; Matsuda S; Moro-oka TA; Okazaki K; Tashiro Y; Iwamoto Y
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1119-22. PubMed ID: 22019323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Does the tibial component remain at malposition risk?
Bové JC
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Sep; 96(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 20605549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Twice cutting method reduces tibial cutting error in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Inui H; Taketomi S; Yamagami R; Sanada T; Tanaka S
Knee; 2016 Jan; 23(1):173-6. PubMed ID: 25982299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An accelerometer-based portable navigation system improved prosthetic alignment after total knee arthroplasty in 3D measurements.
Ueyama H; Minoda Y; Sugama R; Ohta Y; Yamamura K; Nakamura S; Takemura S; Nakamura H
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 May; 27(5):1580-1586. PubMed ID: 30066018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Case-related factors affecting cutting errors of the proximal tibia in total knee arthroplasty assessed by computer navigation.
Tsukeoka T; Tsuneizumi Y; Yoshino K; Suzuki M
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1493-1499. PubMed ID: 28005141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of manual instrumentation of tibial cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty.
Iorio R; Bolle G; Conteduca F; Valeo L; Conteduca J; Mazza D; Ferretti A
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2013 Oct; 21(10):2296-300. PubMed ID: 22527416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are MRI-based, patient matched cutting jigs as accurate as the tibial guides?
Conteduca F; Iorio R; Mazza D; Caperna L; Bolle G; Argento G; Ferretti A
Int Orthop; 2012 Aug; 36(8):1589-93. PubMed ID: 22426932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of MRI-based vs. CT-based patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.
An VV; Sivakumar BS; Phan K; Levy YD; Bruce WJ
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Jan; 22(1):116-120. PubMed ID: 27823847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoperative cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty.
Bäthis H; Perlick L; Tingart M; Perlick C; Lüring C; Grifka J
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2005 Feb; 125(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 15538589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty does not match the pre-operative plan as assessed by intra-operative computer-assisted navigation.
Scholes C; Sahni V; Lustig S; Parker DA; Coolican MR
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2014 Mar; 22(3):660-5. PubMed ID: 24042965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Femur positioning in navigated total knee arthroplasty.
Pfitzner T; Röhner E; Preininger B; Perka C; Matziolis G
Orthopedics; 2012 Oct; 35(10 Suppl):45-9. PubMed ID: 23026252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Verification of in vivo accuracy of Trumatch™ patient-specific instrumentation in total knee replacement using pin-less computer navigation.
Briffa N; Imam MA; Mallina R; Abdelkafy A; Adhikari A
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 Jan; 27(1):125-132. PubMed ID: 27604905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiographic results of an accelerometer-based, handheld surgical navigation system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty.
Nam D; Cross M; Deshmane P; Jerabek S; Kang M; Mayman DJ
Orthopedics; 2011 Oct; 34(10):e615-21. PubMed ID: 21956055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.
Catani F; Biasca N; Ensini A; Leardini A; Bianchi L; Digennaro V; Giannini S
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Apr; 90(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 18381314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Femur-First Technique for Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.
Alarcon Perico D; Lee SH; Labott JR; Guarin Perez SF; Sierra RJ
JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2024; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 38645755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A modified technique to reduce tibial keel cutting errors during an Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Inui H; Taketomi S; Tahara K; Yamagami R; Sanada T; Tanaka S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Mar; 25(3):710-716. PubMed ID: 27139228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty carries a risk of bony gap changes and flexion-extension axis displacement.
Niki Y; Sassa T; Nagai K; Harato K; Kobayashi S; Yamashita T
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3452-3458. PubMed ID: 28224199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
