119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26298808)
1. Vaginal birth after caesarean section prediction models: a UK comparative observational study.
Mone F; Harrity C; Mackie A; Segurado R; Toner B; McCormick TR; Currie A; McAuliffe FM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():136-9. PubMed ID: 26298808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting the chance of vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: validation and elaboration of a published prediction model.
Fagerberg MC; Maršál K; Källén K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():88-94. PubMed ID: 25801723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. French validation and adaptation of the Grobman nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Haumonte JB; Raylet M; Christophe M; Mauviel F; Bertrand A; Desbriere R; d'Ercole C
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 47(3):127-131. PubMed ID: 29229362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting vaginal birth after caesarean section: Validation of the Grobman model in a New Zealand population.
Windsor RS; Clark HE; Blasingame JLJ
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Oct; 62(5):658-663. PubMed ID: 35342928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating success of vaginal birth after caesarean section in a regional Australian population: Validation of a prediction model.
Mooney SS; Hiscock R; Clarke ID; Craig S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Feb; 59(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 29672825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External validation of prediction models for vaginal delivery after the trial of labour among women with previous one caesarean section - A cohort study.
Pegu B; Subburaj SP; Chaturvedula L; Sarkar S; Nair NS; Keepanasseril A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Dec; 291():10-15. PubMed ID: 37801782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean accurate?
Harris BS; Heine RP; Park J; Faurot KR; Hopkins MK; Rivara AJ; Kemeny HR; Grotegut CA; Jelovsek JE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):492.e1-492.e7. PubMed ID: 30716285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean.
Chaillet N; Bujold E; Dubé E; Grobman WA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Feb; 35(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 23470060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of updated antenatal vaginal birth after caesarean section prediction model without race and ethnicity in Australia.
Liu CZ; Mahomed K
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Jun; 63(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 36259468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vaginal birth after a caesarean section: the development of a Western European population-based prediction model for deliveries at term.
Schoorel EN; van Kuijk SM; Melman S; Nijhuis JG; Smits LJ; Aardenburg R; de Boer K; Delemarre FM; van Dooren IM; Franssen MT; Kaplan M; Kleiverda G; Kuppens SM; Kwee A; Lim FT; Mol BW; Roumen FJ; Sikkema JM; Smid-Koopman E; Visser H; Woiski M; Hermens RP; Scheepers HC
BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(2):194-201; discussion 201. PubMed ID: 24373593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with a high intended vaginal delivery rate.
Schoorel EN; Melman S; van Kuijk SM; Grobman WA; Kwee A; Mol BW; Nijhuis JG; Smits LJ; Aardenburg R; de Boer K; Delemarre FM; van Dooren IM; Franssen MT; Kleiverda G; Kaplan M; Kuppens SM; Lim FT; Sikkema JM; Smid-Koopman E; Visser H; Vrouenraets FP; Woiski M; Hermens RP; Scheepers HC
BJOG; 2014 Jun; 121(7):840-7; discussion 847. PubMed ID: 24533534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting why women have elective repeat cesarean deliveries and predictors of successful vaginal birth after cesarean.
Mone F; Harrity C; Toner B; Mcnally A; Adams B; Currie A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jul; 126(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 24731437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the Grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in Jordanian women.
Rawashdeh H; Aljalodi H; Shamleh RA; Alshorman S; AboShindi H; Awawdeh S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Jan; 23(1):49. PubMed ID: 36670392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of antenatal prediction models for vaginal birth after caesarean section.
Lau HCQ; Kwek MEJ; Tan I; Mathur M; Wright A
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2021 Aug; 50(8):606-612. PubMed ID: 34472555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of ante-partum ultrasound in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: A prospective cohort study.
Rizzo G; Bitsadze V; Khizroeva J; Mappa I; Makatsariya A; Liberati M; D'Antonio F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Jan; 256():385-390. PubMed ID: 33279807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: a cohort study.
Tessmer-Tuck JA; El-Nashar SA; Racek AR; Lohse CM; Famuyide AO; Wick MJ
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2014; 77(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 24525697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER A PREVIOUS CAESAREAN SECTION: CURRENT TRENDS AND OUTLOOK IN GHANA.
Seffah JD; Adu-Bonsaffoh K
J West Afr Coll Surg; 2014; 4(2):1-25. PubMed ID: 26587520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section in women with past failed operative vaginal delivery.
Melamed N; Segev M; Hadar E; Peled Y; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jul; 209(1):49.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23507547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting the success of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study in China.
Li YX; Bai Z; Long DJ; Wang HB; Wu YF; Reilly KH; Huang SR; Ji YJ
BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e027807. PubMed ID: 31129593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mode of birth after caesarean section: individual prediction scores using Scottish population data.
Denham SH; Humphrey T; deLabrusse C; Dougall N
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Feb; 19(1):84. PubMed ID: 30819140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
