These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2629910)

  • 1. [Study on BLUP with reduced animal model in evaluation of performance tested males].
    Gong BY
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1989; 16(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 2629910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Animal model and multiple trait BLUP applied in poultry genetic evaluation].
    Pang H; Wu CX; Zhang Y; Gong GF; Bi YH
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1989; 16(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 2486251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of methods for computing approximate accuracies of predicted breeding values in maternal random regression models for growth traits in beef cattle.
    Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1057-66. PubMed ID: 18203980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Illustration of the maternal animal model used for genetic evaluation of beef cattle.
    Crews DH; Wang Z
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1842-8. PubMed ID: 17371795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood.
    Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The misuse of BLUP in ecology and evolution.
    Hadfield JD; Wilson AJ; Garant D; Sheldon BC; Kruuk LE
    Am Nat; 2010 Jan; 175(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 19922262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of dominance components in noninbred populations by using additive animal model residuals.
    Chalh A; El Gazzah M
    J Appl Genet; 2002; 43(4):471-88. PubMed ID: 12441632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Solving large mixed linear models using preconditioned conjugate gradient iteration.
    Strandén I; Lidauer M
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Dec; 82(12):2779-87. PubMed ID: 10629826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Estimates of breeding value of Inner Mongolia cashmere goats using animal model BLUP method].
    Li YR; Li JQ; Gao DP; Zhang LL; Zhou HM; An YJ; Wulanbateer ; Wang B; Zhang YB
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2000; 27(9):777-86. PubMed ID: 11132493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic evaluation of growth in a multibreed beef cattle population using random regression-linear spline models.
    Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):267-77. PubMed ID: 17965329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effectiveness of the best linear unbiased prediction of beef sires using field data collected from small farms.
    Sasaki Y
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Nov; 70(11):3317-21. PubMed ID: 1459892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of the dominance merit in noninbred populations without recourse to its inverted relationship matrix.
    Chalh A; El Gazzah M
    J Appl Genet; 2003; 44(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 12590182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fertility traits in spring-calving Aberdeen Angus cattle. 2. Model comparison.
    Urioste JI; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Nov; 85(11):2861-5. PubMed ID: 17686900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of robust procedures for estimation of breeding values in multiple-trait random regression test-day model.
    Jamrozik J; Fatehi J; Schaeffer LR
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Feb; 124(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 17302954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.
    Henderson CR
    Biometrics; 1975 Jun; 31(2):423-47. PubMed ID: 1174616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of adjusting for heterogeneity of variance in genetic evaluation of Japanese Black cattle.
    Nakaoka H; Narita A; Ibi T; Sasae Y; Miyake T; Yamada T; Sasaki Y
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2429-36. PubMed ID: 17565062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical note: adaptation of an animal-model method for approximation of reliabilities to a sire-maternal grandsire model.
    Wiggans GR; Tsuruta S; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Oct; 91(10):4058-61. PubMed ID: 18832233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A method of computing restricted best linear unbiased prediction of breeding values for some animals in a population.
    Satoh M
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2253-8. PubMed ID: 15318721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Genetic-statistical analysis of environmental and genetic influences on the outcome of the juvenile and breeding performance tests for behaviour traits in Hovawart dogs].
    Boenigk K; Hamann H; Distl O
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2006; 119(5-6):258-69. PubMed ID: 16729474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.