These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2629910)

  • 21. Optimizing selection on multiple identified quantitative trait loci in population with overlapping generations.
    Tang GQ; Li XW
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 May; 33(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 16722338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Milestones in beef cattle genetic evaluation.
    Golden BL; Garrick DJ; Benyshek LL
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Apr; 87(14 Suppl):E3-10. PubMed ID: 19028854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Animal model for genetic evaluation of multibreed data.
    Arnold JW; Bertrand JK; Benyshek LL
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Nov; 70(11):3322-32. PubMed ID: 1459893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genetic evaluation by BLUP in two-breed terminal crossbreeding systems under dominance.
    Lo LL; Fernando RL; Grossman M
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Nov; 75(11):2877-84. PubMed ID: 9374299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An alternative derivation method of mixed model equations from best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and restricted BLUP of breeding values not using maximum likelihood.
    Satoh M
    Anim Sci J; 2018 Jun; 89(6):876-879. PubMed ID: 29687542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adapting best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for timely genetic evaluation: I. Progeny traits in a single contemporary group for each sex.
    Harris DL; Lofgren DL; Stewart TS; Schinckel AP
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Dec; 67(12):3209-22. PubMed ID: 2613570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Technical note: Derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit.
    Strandén I; Garrick DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jun; 92(6):2971-5. PubMed ID: 19448030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reduced animal model with differential genetic grouping for direct and maternal effects.
    Cantet RJ; Schaeffer LR; Smith C
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1730-41. PubMed ID: 1634397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of data structure on variance of prediction error and accuracy of genetic evaluation.
    Tosh JJ; Wilton JW
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Oct; 72(10):2568-77. PubMed ID: 7883613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multitrait animal model with genetic groups.
    Da Y; Grossman M
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Sep; 74(9):3183-95. PubMed ID: 1779067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Genetic evaluation with uncertain parentage: a comparison of methods.
    Perez-Enciso M; Fernando RL
    Theor Appl Genet; 1992 Jun; 84(1-2):173-9. PubMed ID: 24203044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. C. R. Henderson: contributions to predicting genetic merit.
    Schaeffer LR
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Nov; 74(11):4052-66. PubMed ID: 1757643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Absorption of equations for non-parents for an animal model with maternal effects and genetic groups.
    Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Dec; 68(12):4014-25. PubMed ID: 2286544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using machine learning and partial dependence to evaluate robustness of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for phenotypic values.
    Bhandari P; Lee TG
    J Appl Genet; 2024 May; 65(2):283-286. PubMed ID: 38170439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. C. R. Henderson: the unfinished legacy.
    Kennedy BW
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Nov; 74(11):4067-81. PubMed ID: 1757644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The development and current situation of the methods for genetic evaluation in livestock].
    Yu Y; Zhang Y
    Yi Chuan; 2003 Sep; 25(5):607-10. PubMed ID: 15639941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Why not routinely use best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) as estimates of cholesterol, per cent fat from kcal and physical activity?
    Stanek EJ; Well A; Ockene I
    Stat Med; 1999 Nov; 18(21):2943-59. PubMed ID: 10523752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reduced Animal Models Fitting Only Equations for Phenotyped Animals.
    Nilforooshan MA; Garrick D
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():637626. PubMed ID: 33828583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Calculation of prediction error variances using sparse matrix methods.
    Thompson R; Wray NR; Crump RE
    J Anim Breed Genet; 1994 Jan; 111(1-6):102-9. PubMed ID: 21395757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction with measurement errors in finite populations.
    Singer JM; Stanek EJ; Lencina VB; González LM; Li W; Martino SS
    Stat Probab Lett; 2012 Feb; 82(2):332-339. PubMed ID: 22162621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.