These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2629914)

  • 1. [Effects of longterm selection on the genetic structure of populations--a simulation study. I. Simulation models and selection responses].
    Wu ZX; Zhang YA; Yang ZH
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1989; 16(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 2629914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The effects of longterm selection on the genetic structure of populations--a simulation study. II. The effects of selection on genetic variances].
    Yang ZH; Wu ZX; Zhang Y
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1989; 16(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 2486250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The genetic analysis of long-term index selection--a simulation experiment].
    Zhang S; Wu C
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1992; 19(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 1524852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Background selection and population differentiation.
    Hu XS; He F
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Jul; 235(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 15862590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A review on Monte Carlo simulation methods as they apply to mutation and selection as formulated in Wright-Fisher models of evolutionary genetics.
    Mode CJ; Gallop RJ
    Math Biosci; 2008 Feb; 211(2):205-25. PubMed ID: 18190932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic differentiation of neutral markers and quantitative traits in predominantly selfing metapopulations: confronting theory and experiments with Arabidopsis thaliana.
    Porcher E; Giraud T; Lavigne C
    Genet Res; 2006 Feb; 87(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 16545147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Dynamics of the haplotype frequencies in populations: study using the Monte Carlo method].
    Grigorenko EL; Shikanian AA; Kidd DR; Dorig R; Kidd KK
    Genetika; 1996 Dec; 32(12):1705-13. PubMed ID: 9102365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A potential bias in the temporal method for estimating Ne in admixed populations under natural selection.
    Araki H; Waples RS; Blouin MS
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Jun; 16(11):2261-71. PubMed ID: 17561889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parental selection, number of breeding populations, and size of each population in inbred development.
    Bernardo R
    Theor Appl Genet; 2003 Nov; 107(7):1252-6. PubMed ID: 12928779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictions of the dynamics of a polygenic character under directional selection.
    Bürger R
    J Theor Biol; 1993 Jun; 162(4):487-513. PubMed ID: 8412235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in variance components of flanking marker genotypes under varying selection intensities.
    Wang H; Chen YS
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Apr; 33(4):312-8. PubMed ID: 16625829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kin groups and trait groups: population structure and epidemic disease selection.
    Fix AG
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1984 Oct; 65(2):201-12. PubMed ID: 6507610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid evolutionary escape by large populations from local fitness peaks is likely in nature.
    Weinreich DM; Chao L
    Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1175-82. PubMed ID: 16050095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Premeiotic clusters of mutation and the cost of natural selection.
    Woodruff RC; Thompson JN; Gu S
    J Hered; 2004; 95(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 15247306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gene-dropping vs. empirical variance estimation for allele-sharing linkage statistics.
    Jung J; Weeks DE; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):652-65. PubMed ID: 16917920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reversed selection responses in small populations of the housefly (Musca domestica L.).
    Meffert LM; Regan JL
    Genetica; 2006 May; 127(1-3):1-9. PubMed ID: 16850208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the regressive models in linkage analysis of quantitative traits.
    Demenais F; Lathrop M
    Genet Epidemiol; 1993; 10(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 8314065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mutation-selection balance accounting for genetic variation for viability in Drosophila melanogaster as deduced from an inbreeding and artificial selection experiment.
    Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Pérez-Figueroa A; Fernández B; Fernández J; Caballero A
    J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):528-41. PubMed ID: 15149396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Landscape genetic analyses reveal cryptic population structure and putative selection gradients in a large-scale estuarine environment.
    McCairns RJ; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Sep; 17(17):3901-16. PubMed ID: 18662229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.