317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26299540)
1. Fixed, low radiant exposure vs. incremental radiant exposure approach for diode laser hair reduction: a randomized, split axilla, comparative single-blinded trial.
Pavlović MD; Adamič M; Nenadić D
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):2377-81. PubMed ID: 26299540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoepilation with a diode laser vs. intense pulsed light: a randomized, intrapatient left-to-right trial.
Klein A; Steinert S; Baeumler W; Landthaler M; Babilas P
Br J Dermatol; 2013 Jun; 168(6):1287-93. PubMed ID: 23278132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term efficacy of linear-scanning 808 nm diode laser for hair removal compared to a scanned alexandrite laser.
Grunewald S; Bodendorf MO; Zygouris A; Simon JC; Paasch U
Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Jan; 46(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 24127195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term Comparison of a Large Spot Vacuum Assisted Handpiece vs the Small Spot Size Traditional Handpiece of the 800 nm Diode Laser.
Youssef NJ; Rizk AG; Ibrahimi OA; Tannous ZS
J Drugs Dermatol; 2017 Sep; 16(9):893-898. PubMed ID: 28915284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of efficacy and safety of a novel 755-nm diode laser with conventional 755-nm alexandrite laser in reduction of axillary hairs.
Ayatollahi A; Samadi A; Rajabi-Estarabadi A; Yadangi S; Nouri K; Firooz A
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Mar; 35(2):373-378. PubMed ID: 31278429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the effect of diode laser versus intense pulsed light in axillary hair removal.
Ormiga P; Ishida CE; Boechat A; Ramos-E-Silva M
Dermatol Surg; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1061-9. PubMed ID: 25229781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low fluence-high repetition rate diode laser hair removal 12-month evaluation: reducing pain and risks while keeping clinical efficacy.
Barolet D
Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Apr; 44(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 22437967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of two 810 diode lasers for hair removal: low fluence, multiple pass versus a high fluence, single pass technique.
Koo B; Ball K; Tremaine AM; Zachary CB
Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Apr; 46(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 24752608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of hair reduction with three lasers and light sources: prospective, blinded and controlled study.
Sochor M; Curkova AK; Schwarczova Z; Sochorova R; Simaljakova M; Buchvald J
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Oct; 13(5):210-5. PubMed ID: 21932934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A split axilla comparison study of axillary hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate 810 nm diode laser vs. high fluence low repetition rate 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser.
Wanitphakdeedecha R; Thanomkitti K; Sethabutra P; Eimpunth S; Manuskiatti W
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1133-6. PubMed ID: 21923659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Novel 755-nm diode laser vs. conventional 755-nm scanned alexandrite laser: Side-by-side comparison pilot study for thorax and axillary hair removal.
Paasch U; Wagner JA; Paasch HW
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2015; 17(4):189-93. PubMed ID: 25607745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term clinical evaluation of a 800-nm long-pulsed diode laser with a large spot size and vacuum-assisted suction for hair removal.
Ibrahimi OA; Kilmer SL
Dermatol Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 22455549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative effectiveness of ice packs versus topical lidocaine-prilocaine mixture for pain control in laser hair removal of the axilla: A rater-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Roongpisuthipong W; Christensen RE; Dirr MA; Anvery N; Geisler A; Schaeffer M; Waldman A; Brieva JC; Alam M
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 Mar; 88(3):617-622. PubMed ID: 36410628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Permanent hair reduction with a home-use diode laser: Safety and effectiveness 1 year after eight treatments.
Wheeland RG
Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Sep; 44(7):550-7. PubMed ID: 22886431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One-year follow-up results of hair removal using an 810 nm diode laser.
Goldberg DJ
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2018 Oct; 17(5):775-778. PubMed ID: 30251358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Novel laser hair removal in all skin types.
Gold MH; Weiss E; Biron J
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2023 Apr; 22(4):1261-1265. PubMed ID: 36756716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of high-fluence, single-pass diode laser to low-fluence, multiple-pass diode laser for laser hair reduction with 18 months of follow up.
Braun M
J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Jan; 10(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 21197525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective, comparative evaluation of three laser systems used individually and in combination for axillary hair removal.
Rao J; Goldman MP
Dermatol Surg; 2005 Dec; 31(12):1671-6; discussion 1677. PubMed ID: 16336886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser vs. intense pulsed light for hair removal in dark skin: a randomized controlled trial.
Ismail SA
Br J Dermatol; 2012 Feb; 166(2):317-21. PubMed ID: 21999492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Split-leg comparison of low fluence diode laser and high fluence intense pulsed light in permanent hair reduction in skin types III to IV.
Chen J; Liu XJ; Huo MH
Australas J Dermatol; 2012 Aug; 53(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 22881465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
