These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Mini-drainage devices: the Ex-PRESS Mini-Glaucoma Device. Rouse JM; Sarkisian SR Dev Ophthalmol; 2012; 50():90-5. PubMed ID: 22517176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Glaucoma drainage devices: a systematic literature review and current controversies. Bernardino CR; Chang EL; Hatton MP; Rubin PA; Dohlman CH Surv Ophthalmol; 2005; 50(4):411; author reply 411. PubMed ID: 15967196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) using a 3D Digital Surgical Ophthalmic Exoscope. Provencher LM Am J Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 249():e2-e3. PubMed ID: 36801382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Assessment of the Incorporation of Patient-Centric Outcomes in Studies of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgical Devices. Le JT; Viswanathan S; Tarver ME; Eydelman M; Li T JAMA Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 134(9):1054-6. PubMed ID: 27389667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Management of glaucoma drainage implant tube kink and obstruction with Pars Plana Clip. Netland PA; Schuman S Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(2):167-8. PubMed ID: 15792322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Ex-PRESS mini glaucoma shunt: surgical technique and review of clinical experience. Hendrick AM; Kahook MY Expert Rev Med Devices; 2008 Nov; 5(6):673-7. PubMed ID: 19025342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Ab interno approach to the subconjunctival space using a collagen glaucoma stent. Lewis RA J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1301-6. PubMed ID: 24943904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Pediatric glaucoma surgery: a report by the American Academy Of Ophthalmology. Chen TC; Chen PP; Francis BA; Junk AK; Smith SD; Singh K; Lin SC Ophthalmology; 2014 Nov; 121(11):2107-15. PubMed ID: 25066765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. 15 years of minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) experience and data: a rationale for optimal clinical decision-making. Prata TS; Daga FB; Francesco T; Ahmed IIK Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2023; 86(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 37466495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. [One-year results on the safety and efficacy of the InnFocus MicroShunt™ depending on placement and concentration of mitomycin C]. Riss I; Batlle J; Pinchuk L; Kato YP; Weber BA; Parel JM J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Nov; 38(9):855-60. PubMed ID: 26363923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Glaucoma drainage devices: a systematic literature review and current controversies. Hong CH; Arosemena A; Zurakowski D; Ayyala RS Surv Ophthalmol; 2005; 50(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 15621077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Device tracking: what's covered? How'll it work? Muehlbauer EJ Health Facil Manage; 1992 Oct; 5(10):40, 42-3. PubMed ID: 10121451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in glaucoma. Dada T; Gadia R; Sharma A; Ichhpujani P; Bali SJ; Bhartiya S; Panda A Surv Ophthalmol; 2011; 56(5):433-50. PubMed ID: 21783220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. To have (medical devices) or not: what's safer for patients? McCormack J Health Facil Manage; 1995 Jun; 8(6):44, 46, 48. PubMed ID: 10142630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]