194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26299740)
1. [Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus mFOLFOX6 Compared to Bevacizumab Plus mFOLFOX6 for First-line Treatment of Patients with Wild-type RAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer--Czech Republic Model Adaptation].
Fínek J; Skoupá J; Jandová P
Klin Onkol; 2015; 28(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 26299740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Rivera F; Valladares M; Gea S; López-Martínez N
J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 28107090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US.
Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH
J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PEAK: a randomized, multicenter phase II study of panitumumab plus modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer.
Schwartzberg LS; Rivera F; Karthaus M; Fasola G; Canon JL; Hecht JR; Yu H; Oliner KS; Go WY
J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jul; 32(21):2240-7. PubMed ID: 24687833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rationale for and Design of the PARADIGM Study: Randomized Phase III Study of mFOLFOX6 Plus Bevacizumab or Panitumumab in Chemotherapy-naïve Patients With RAS (KRAS/NRAS) Wild-type, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Yoshino T; Uetake H; Tsuchihara K; Shitara K; Yamazaki K; Oki E; Sato T; Naitoh T; Komatsu Y; Kato T; Yamanaka K; Iwasaki K; Soeda J; Hihara M; Yamanaka T; Ochiai A; Muro K
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2017 Jun; 16(2):158-163. PubMed ID: 28237539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Economic Evaluation of mFOLFOX6-based First-line Regimens for Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Using Clinical Decision Analysis].
Shida T; Endo Y; Shiraishi T; Yoshioka T; Suzuki K; Kobayashi Y; Ono Y; Ito T; Inoue T
Yakugaku Zasshi; 2018; 138(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 29311468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of targeted therapy with cetuximab in patients with K-ras wild-type colorectal cancer presenting with initially unresectable metastases limited to the liver in a German setting.
Asseburg C; Frank M; Köhne CH; Hartmann JT; Griebsch I; Mohr A; Osowski U; Schulten J; Mittendorf T
Clin Ther; 2011 Apr; 33(4):482-97. PubMed ID: 21635994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line FOLFIRI Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Han J; Xiao D; Tan C; Zeng X; Hu H; Zeng S; Jiang Q; She L; Yao L; Li L; Tang L; Ma J; Huang J; Shen L
Cancer Control; 2020; 27(1):1073274820902271. PubMed ID: 32107929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. First- and second-line bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Goldstein DA; Chen Q; Ayer T; Howard DH; Lipscomb J; El-Rayes BF; Flowers CR
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 25691669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Wild-Type Ras Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Shi Y; Wan X; Tan C; Li J; Peng L
Adv Ther; 2020 Feb; 37(2):847-859. PubMed ID: 31902066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. mFOLFOX6 Plus Panitumumab Versus 5-FU/LV Plus Panitumumab After Six Cycles of Frontline mFOLFOX6 Plus Panitumumab: A Randomized Phase II Study of Patients With Unresectable or Advanced/Recurrent, RAS Wild-type Colorectal Carcinoma (SAPPHIRE)-Study Design and Rationale.
Nagata N; Mishima H; Kurosawa S; Oba K; Sakamoto J
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2017 Jun; 16(2):154-157.e1. PubMed ID: 28284575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRI + cetuximab vs FOLFIRI + bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of
Stintzing S; van Oostrum I; Pescott CP; Ronga P; Heeg B; Heinemann V
J Med Econ; 2020 May; 23(5):448-455. PubMed ID: 31903807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial.
Wang H; Huang L; Gao P; Zhu Z; Ye W; Ding H; Fang L
BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e030738. PubMed ID: 32051297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Panitumumab-based maintenance after oxaliplatin discontinuation in metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective analysis of two randomised trials.
Modest DP; Rivera F; Bachet JB; de Braud F; Pietrantonio F; Koukakis R; Demonty G; Douillard JY
Int J Cancer; 2019 Jul; 145(2):576-585. PubMed ID: 30614531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-minimization analysis of panitumumab compared with cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Fakih MG; Knox HN; Maglinte GA; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Schwartzberg LS
J Med Econ; 2015; 18(8):619-28. PubMed ID: 25822327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Value of Current Therapies.
Goldstein DA; Zeichner SB; Bartnik CM; Neustadter E; Flowers CR
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2016 Mar; 15(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26541320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of selective first-line use of biologics for unresectable
Wong WWL; Zargar M; Berry SR; Ko YJ; Riesco-Martínez M; Chan KKW
Curr Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(5):e597-e609. PubMed ID: 31708653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
