These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26299891)

  • 21. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the generality of the displaywide contingent orienting hypothesis: can a visual onset capture attention without top-down control settings for displaywide onset?
    Yeh SL; Liao HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 20638648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Display probability modulates attentional capture by onset distractors.
    Sayim B; Grubert A; Herzog MH; Krummenacher J
    J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):10.1-8. PubMed ID: 20377287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons.
    Gaspelin N; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 27804032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The time course of the contingent spatial blink.
    Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 16035345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The perceptual enhancement by spatial attention is impaired during the attentional blink.
    Bae E; Jung S; Han SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():150-158. PubMed ID: 30119048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Human variation in overriding attentional capture.
    Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 29(27):8726-33. PubMed ID: 19587279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention?
    Remington RW; Folk CL; McLean JP
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 11281104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. N2pc and attentional capture by colour and orientation-singletons in pure and mixed visual search tasks.
    Rodríguez Holguín S; Doallo S; Vizoso C; Cadaveira F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19409424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Altering attentional control settings causes persistent biases of visual attention.
    Knight HC; Smith DT; Knight DC; Ellison A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):129-49. PubMed ID: 25801329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Feature specificity in attentional capture by size and color.
    Harris AM; Remington RW; Becker SI
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contingent capture can occur at specific feature values: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Jiao J; Zhao G; Wang Q; Zhang K; Li H; Sun HJ; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 23069637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance and color singletons.
    Irwin DE; Colcombe AM; Kramer AF; Hahn S
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(10-12):1443-58. PubMed ID: 10788651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis.
    Yeh SL; Liao HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 18614130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture.
    Ghorashi SM; Zuvic SM; Visser TA; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 12669749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hidden from view: Statistical learning exposes latent attentional capture.
    Hilchey MD; Pratt J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1633-1640. PubMed ID: 31152432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spatial attention can be biased towards an expected dimension.
    Burnett KE; Close AC; d'Avossa G; Sapir A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Nov; 69(11):2218-32. PubMed ID: 27033515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.