141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26300001)
1. The putative oncogene CEP72 inhibits the mitotic function of BRCA1 and induces chromosomal instability.
Lüddecke S; Ertych N; Stenzinger A; Weichert W; Beissbarth T; Dyczkowski J; Gaedcke J; Valerius O; Braus GH; Kschischo M; Bastians H
Oncogene; 2016 May; 35(18):2398-406. PubMed ID: 26300001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CHK2-BRCA1 tumor-suppressor axis restrains oncogenic Aurora-A kinase to ensure proper mitotic microtubule assembly.
Ertych N; Stolz A; Valerius O; Braus GH; Bastians H
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Feb; 113(7):1817-22. PubMed ID: 26831064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Loss of the tumour-suppressor genes CHK2 and BRCA1 results in chromosomal instability.
Stolz A; Ertych N; Bastians H
Biochem Soc Trans; 2010 Dec; 38(6):1704-8. PubMed ID: 21118151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BRCA1 interaction of centrosomal protein Nlp is required for successful mitotic progression.
Jin S; Gao H; Mazzacurati L; Wang Y; Fan W; Chen Q; Yu W; Wang M; Zhu X; Zhang C; Zhan Q
J Biol Chem; 2009 Aug; 284(34):22970-7. PubMed ID: 19509300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increased microtubule assembly rates influence chromosomal instability in colorectal cancer cells.
Ertych N; Stolz A; Stenzinger A; Weichert W; Kaulfuß S; Burfeind P; Aigner A; Wordeman L; Bastians H
Nat Cell Biol; 2014 Aug; 16(8):779-91. PubMed ID: 24976383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The CHK2-BRCA1 tumour suppressor pathway ensures chromosomal stability in human somatic cells.
Stolz A; Ertych N; Kienitz A; Vogel C; Schneider V; Fritz B; Jacob R; Dittmar G; Weichert W; Petersen I; Bastians H
Nat Cell Biol; 2010 May; 12(5):492-9. PubMed ID: 20364141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MAP9 Loss Triggers Chromosomal Instability, Initiates Colorectal Tumorigenesis, and Is Associated with Poor Survival of Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
Wang S; Huang J; Li C; Zhao L; Wong CC; Zhai J; Zhou Y; Deng W; Zeng Y; Gao S; Zhang Y; Wang G; Guan XY; Wei H; Wong SH; He HH; Shay JW; Yu J
Clin Cancer Res; 2020 Feb; 26(3):746-757. PubMed ID: 31662330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subcellular localization of the BRCA1 gene product in mitotic cells.
Lotti LV; Ottini L; D'Amico C; Gradini R; Cama A; Belleudi F; Frati L; Torrisi MR; Mariani-Costantini R
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2002 Nov; 35(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 12353262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. TOGp regulates microtubule assembly and density during mitosis and contributes to chromosome directional instability.
Cassimeris L; Becker B; Carney B
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton; 2009 Aug; 66(8):535-45. PubMed ID: 19373773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. BRCA1 is regulated by Chk2 in response to spindle damage.
Chabalier-Taste C; Racca C; Dozier C; Larminat F
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2008 Dec; 1783(12):2223-33. PubMed ID: 18804494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA-PKcs activates the Chk2-Brca1 pathway during mitosis to ensure chromosomal stability.
Shang Z; Yu L; Lin YF; Matsunaga S; Shen CY; Chen BP
Oncogenesis; 2014 Feb; 3(2):e85. PubMed ID: 24492479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hice1, a novel microtubule-associated protein required for maintenance of spindle integrity and chromosomal stability in human cells.
Wu G; Lin YT; Wei R; Chen Y; Shan Z; Lee WH
Mol Cell Biol; 2008 Jun; 28(11):3652-62. PubMed ID: 18362163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CHK2 overexpression and mislocalisation within mitotic structures enhances chromosomal instability and hepatocellular carcinoma progression.
Carloni V; Lulli M; Madiai S; Mello T; Hall A; Luong TV; Pinzani M; Rombouts K; Galli A
Gut; 2018 Feb; 67(2):348-361. PubMed ID: 28360097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Possible causes of chromosome instability: comparison of chromosomal abnormalities in cancer cell lines with mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHK2 and BUB1.
Grigorova M; Staines JM; Ozdag H; Caldas C; Edwards PA
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2004; 104(1-4):333-40. PubMed ID: 15162061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MYC Dysregulates Mitosis, Revealing Cancer Vulnerabilities.
Rohrberg J; Van de Mark D; Amouzgar M; Lee JV; Taileb M; Corella A; Kilinc S; Williams J; Jokisch ML; Camarda R; Balakrishnan S; Shankar R; Zhou A; Chang AN; Chen B; Rugo HS; Dumont S; Goga A
Cell Rep; 2020 Mar; 30(10):3368-3382.e7. PubMed ID: 32160543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Loss of BRCA1 impairs centromeric cohesion and triggers chromosomal instability.
Di Paolo A; Racca C; Calsou P; Larminat F
FASEB J; 2014 Dec; 28(12):5250-61. PubMed ID: 25205741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ribosomal protein S3 localizes on the mitotic spindle and functions as a microtubule associated protein in mitosis.
Jang CY; Kim HD; Zhang X; Chang JS; Kim J
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2012 Dec; 429(1-2):57-62. PubMed ID: 23131551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tumor suppressor CHK2: regulator of DNA damage response and mediator of chromosomal stability.
Stolz A; Ertych N; Bastians H
Clin Cancer Res; 2011 Feb; 17(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 21088254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mitotic kinases: the key to duplication, segregation, and cytokinesis errors, chromosomal instability, and oncogenesis.
Li JJ; Li SA
Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Sep; 111(3):974-84. PubMed ID: 16603252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Kid, a novel kinesin-like DNA binding protein, is localized to chromosomes and the mitotic spindle.
Tokai N; Fujimoto-Nishiyama A; Toyoshima Y; Yonemura S; Tsukita S; Inoue J; Yamamota T
EMBO J; 1996 Feb; 15(3):457-67. PubMed ID: 8599929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
