These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26300382)
1. Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy. Linder BJ; Chow GK; Elliott DS Int J Urol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1155-8. PubMed ID: 26300382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes. Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse. Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy. Jong K; Klein T; Zimmern PE J Robot Surg; 2018 Sep; 12(3):455-460. PubMed ID: 28980173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mid term outcome of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy. Belsante M; Murray S; Dillon B; Zimmern P Can J Urol; 2013 Feb; 20(1):6656-61. PubMed ID: 23433141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Using Only Absorbable Suture for Mesh Fixation. Linder BJ; Anand M; Klingele CJ; Trabuco EC; Gebhart JB; Occhino JA Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 27636221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Using Lightweight Y-Mesh. Culligan PJ; Lewis C; Priestley J; Mushonga N Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 26(3):202-206. PubMed ID: 31688526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years. Vandendriessche D; Sussfeld J; Giraudet G; Lucot JP; Behal H; Cosson M Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Feb; 28(2):231-239. PubMed ID: 27549223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reoperation After Robotic and Vaginal Mesh Reconstructive Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Martin LA; Calixte R; Finamore PS Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 26506158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mesh complications and failure rates after transvaginal mesh repair compared with abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to native tissue repair in treating apical prolapse. Dandolu V; Akiyama M; Allenback G; Pathak P Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Feb; 28(2):215-222. PubMed ID: 27562466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative Outcomes, Complications, and Efficacy of Robotic-Assisted Prolapse Repair: A Single Institution Study of 196 Patients. Gupta P; Ehlert M; Bartley J; Gilleran J; Killinger KA; Boura JA; Nagaraju P; Fischer M Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(6):408-411. PubMed ID: 28922303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: how low does the mesh go? Wong V; Guzman Rojas R; Shek KL; Chou D; Moore KH; Dietz HP Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):404-408. PubMed ID: 26877210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term pelvic organ prolapse recurrence and mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy. Thomas TN; Davidson ERW; Lampert EJ; Paraiso MFR; Ferrando CA Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1763-1770. PubMed ID: 32253489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparison of two different techniques used in urology and gynecology. Orhan A; Ozerkan K; Vuruskan H; Ocakoglu G; Kasapoglu I; Koşan B; Uncu G Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):623-632. PubMed ID: 30627828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: 8 years experience. Granese R; Candiani M; Perino A; Romano F; Cucinella G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Oct; 146(2):227-31. PubMed ID: 19615810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database. Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]