These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26300468)

  • 41. A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning.
    De Houwer J
    Span J Psychol; 2007 Nov; 10(2):230-41. PubMed ID: 17992949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Distributed practice can boost evaluative conditioning by increasing memory for the stimulus pairs.
    Richter J; Gast A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():1-13. PubMed ID: 28686882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. ANS responses and facial expressions differentiate between the taste of commercial breakfast drinks.
    de Wijk RA; He W; Mensink MG; Verhoeven RH; de Graaf C
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93823. PubMed ID: 24714107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Of two minds or one? A registered replication of Rydell et al. (2006).
    Heycke T; Gehrmann S; Haaf JM; Stahl C
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Dec; 32(8):1708-1727. PubMed ID: 29383978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Listening to music can influence hedonic and sensory perceptions of gelati.
    Kantono K; Hamid N; Shepherd D; Yoo MJ; Grazioli G; Carr BT
    Appetite; 2016 May; 100():244-55. PubMed ID: 26923742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Autonomic Responses Associated with Olfactory Preferences of Fragrance Consumers: Skin Conductance, Respiration, and Heart Rate.
    Tang B; Zhu M; Wu Y; Guo G; Hu Z; Ding Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Aug; 24(17):. PubMed ID: 39275516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Doing is for feeling.
    Blask K; Frings C; Walther E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Oct; 145(10):1263-1268. PubMed ID: 27513306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Labels affect both liking and preference: the better the stimuli, the bigger the preference.
    Zellner DA; Hoer K; Feldman J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2189-92. PubMed ID: 25239098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Explicit and Implicit Responses to Tasting Drinks Associated with Different Tasting Experiences.
    Kaneko D; Hogervorst M; Toet A; van Erp JBF; Kallen V; Brouwer AM
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 31614504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Two roads leading to the same evaluative conditioning effect? Stimulus-response binding versus operant conditioning.
    Singh T; Frings C; Walther E
    Cogn Emot; 2024 Aug; 38(5):825-833. PubMed ID: 38512042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluative Conditioning and the Development of Attitudes in Early Childhood.
    Halbeisen G; Walther E; Schneider M
    Child Dev; 2017 Sep; 88(5):1536-1543. PubMed ID: 27797098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Can Evaluative Conditioning Change Well-Established Attitudes Towards Popular Brands? Your Brain Says Yes Even Though Your Mouth Says No.
    Bosshard S; Koller M; Walla P
    Brain Sci; 2019 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 31083429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The interplay of multiple unconditioned stimuli in evaluative conditioning: A weighted averaging framework for attitude formation via stimulus co-occurrences.
    Ingendahl M; Vogel T; Woitzel J; Bücker N; Boers J; Alves H
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2024 Nov; 127(5):964-985. PubMed ID: 39207436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Guilty by mere association: evaluative conditioning and the spreading attitude effect.
    Walther E
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Jun; 82(6):919-34. PubMed ID: 12051580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sweet reward increases implicit discrimination of similar odors.
    Pool E; Delplanque S; Porcherot C; Jenkins T; Cayeux I; Sander D
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2014; 8():158. PubMed ID: 24834039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Learning to Dislike Chocolate: Conditioning Negative Attitudes toward Chocolate and Its Effect on Chocolate Consumption.
    Wang Y; Wang G; Zhang D; Wang L; Cui X; Zhu J; Fang Y
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1468. PubMed ID: 28900409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. When People Co-occur With Good or Bad Events: Graded Effects of Relational Qualifiers on Evaluative Conditioning.
    Hughes S; Ye Y; Van Dessel P; De Houwer J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Feb; 45(2):196-208. PubMed ID: 29952232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of self-instructed stimulus-affect plans on indirectly measured and self-reported evaluative responses.
    Martiny-Huenger T; Roth J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Mar; 223():103485. PubMed ID: 34999353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Expanding the boundaries of evaluative learning research: How intersecting regularities shape our likes and dislikes.
    Hughes S; De Houwer J; Perugini M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Jun; 145(6):731-54. PubMed ID: 27123573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Four studies yield limited evidence for prepared (disgust) learning via evaluative conditioning.
    Çınar Ç; Perone P; Tybur JM
    Appetite; 2024 May; 196():107256. PubMed ID: 38342314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.