These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26300698)

  • 1. Efficient prediction designs for random fields.
    Müller WG; Pronzato L; Rendas J; Waldl H
    Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind; 2015 Mar; 31(2):178-194. PubMed ID: 26300698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the construction of experimental designs for a given task by jointly optimizing several quality criteria: Pareto-optimal experimental designs.
    Sánchez MS; Sarabia LA; Ortiz MC
    Anal Chim Acta; 2012 Nov; 754():39-46. PubMed ID: 23140952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design optimization of stent and its dilatation balloon using kriging surrogate model.
    Li H; Liu T; Wang M; Zhao D; Qiao A; Wang X; Gu J; Li Z; Zhu B
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Jan; 16(1):13. PubMed ID: 28086895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. D-optimal designs of mean-covariance models for longitudinal data.
    Yi S; Zhou Y; Pan J
    Biom J; 2021 Jun; 63(5):1072-1085. PubMed ID: 33604890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5.
    Liu X; Yue R; Zhang Z; Wong WK
    Soft comput; 2021; 25(21):13549-13565. PubMed ID: 34720706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A divide-and-conquer approach to determine the Pareto frontier for optimization of protein engineering experiments.
    He L; Friedman AM; Bailey-Kellogg C
    Proteins; 2012 Mar; 80(3):790-806. PubMed ID: 22180081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-fidelity modelling via recursive co-kriging and Gaussian-Markov random fields.
    Perdikaris P; Venturi D; Royset JO; Karniadakis GE
    Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2015 Jul; 471(2179):20150018. PubMed ID: 26345079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal flexible sample size design with robust power.
    Zhang L; Cui L; Yang B
    Stat Med; 2016 Aug; 35(19):3385-96. PubMed ID: 26999385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A computer tool for a minimax criterion in binary response and heteroscedastic simple linear regression models.
    Casero-Alonso V; López-Fidalgo J; Torsney B
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Jan; 138():105-115. PubMed ID: 27886709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Second-Phase Sampling Designs for Non-Stationary Spatial Variables.
    Delmelle EM; Goovaerts P
    Geoderma; 2009 Oct; 153(1-2):205-216. PubMed ID: 20625537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploratory ensemble designs for environmental models using k-extended Latin Hypercubes.
    Williamson D
    Environmetrics; 2015 Jun; 26(4):268-283. PubMed ID: 26028983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal designs for discrete-time survival models with random effects.
    Zhou XD; Wang YJ; Yue RX
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2021 Apr; 27(2):300-332. PubMed ID: 33417074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-objective optimization of coronary stent using Kriging surrogate model.
    Li H; Gu J; Wang M; Zhao D; Li Z; Qiao A; Zhu B
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 2):148. PubMed ID: 28155700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pareto optimization in algebraic dynamic programming.
    Saule C; Giegerich R
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2015; 10():22. PubMed ID: 26150892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accurate Multiobjective Design in a Space of Millions of Transition Metal Complexes with Neural-Network-Driven Efficient Global Optimization.
    Janet JP; Ramesh S; Duan C; Kulik HJ
    ACS Cent Sci; 2020 Apr; 6(4):513-524. PubMed ID: 32342001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation and comparison of geostatistical and spline models for spatial stream networks.
    Rushworth AM; Peterson EE; Ver Hoef JM; Bowman AW
    Environmetrics; 2015 Aug; 26(5):327-338. PubMed ID: 27563267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal designs for copula models.
    Perrone E; Müller WG
    Statistics (Ber); 2016 Jul; 50(4):917-929. PubMed ID: 27453616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximum expected entropy transformed Latin hypercube designs.
    Sheng C; Tan MHY; Zou L
    J Appl Stat; 2021; 48(12):2152-2177. PubMed ID: 35706614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiobjective Calibration of Disease Simulation Models Using Gaussian Processes.
    Sai A; Vivas-Valencia C; Imperiale TF; Kong N
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Jul; 39(5):540-552. PubMed ID: 31375053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accounting for uncertainty in the historical response rate of the standard treatment in single-arm two-stage designs based on Bayesian power functions.
    Matano F; Sambucini V
    Pharm Stat; 2016 Nov; 15(6):517-530. PubMed ID: 27766770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.