These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26301613)

  • 1. Testing the limits of the Perruchet effect in choice response time tasks.
    Lee Cheong Lem VA; Harris JA; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):385-94. PubMed ID: 26301613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociations between expectancy and performance in simple and two-choice reaction-time tasks: A test of associative and nonassociative explanations.
    Barrett LC; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):864-77. PubMed ID: 20565206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Saving the Perruchet effect: A role for the strength of the association in associative learning.
    Destrebecqz A; Vande Velde M; San Anton E; Cleeremans A; Bertels J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1379-1386. PubMed ID: 29991319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automaticity and conscious control in single and choice response time versions of the Perruchet effect.
    Livesey EJ; Costa DS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):646-64. PubMed ID: 23972053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Associations or repetitions? Testing the basis of the Perruchet effect in voluntary response speed.
    Lee Cheong Lem VA; Moul C; Harris JA; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1971-1985. PubMed ID: 29683708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do reaction times in the Perruchet effect reflect variations in the strength of an associative link?
    Mitchell CJ; Wardle SG; Lovibond PF; Weidemann G; Chang BP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):567-72. PubMed ID: 20192552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of temporal factors on automatic priming and conscious expectancy in a simple reaction time task.
    Destrebecqz A; Perruchet P; Cleeremans A; Laureys S; Maquet P; Peigneux P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):291-309. PubMed ID: 19526437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociating expectancy of shock and changes in skin conductance: an investigation of the Perruchet effect using an electrodermal paradigm.
    McAndrew A; Jones FW; McLaren RP; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Apr; 38(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22250788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The time-event correlation effect is due to temporal expectancy, not to partial transition costs.
    Thomaschke R; Dreisbach G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):196-218. PubMed ID: 25419671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motor preparation and the effects of practice: evidence from startle.
    Maslovat D; Hodges NJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    Behav Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 125(2):226-40. PubMed ID: 21280935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociating expectancy-based and experience-based control in task switching.
    Liu C; Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Feb; 46(2):131-154. PubMed ID: 31985251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Control of response timing occurs during the simple reaction time interval but on-line for choice reaction time.
    Maslovat D; Klapp ST; Jagacinski RJ; Franks IM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):2005-21. PubMed ID: 25068697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is Perruchet's dissociation between eyeblink conditioned responding and outcome expectancy evidence for two learning systems?
    Weidemann G; Tangen JM; Lovibond PF; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 19364226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Both trace and delay conditioned eyeblink responding can be dissociated from outcome expectancy.
    Weidemann G; Broderick J; Lovibond PF; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21728453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociating conscious expectancies from automatic link formation in associative learning: a review on the so-called Perruchet effect.
    Perruchet P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Apr; 41(2):105-27. PubMed ID: 25867141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing of expected and unexpected monetary performance outcomes in healthy older subjects.
    Bellebaum C; Kobza S; Thiele S; Daum I
    Behav Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 125(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 21280937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations.
    Pfister R; Kiesel A; Melcher T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 20875631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of performance in simple and choice reaction time tasks between obese and healthy-weight children.
    Gentier I; Augustijn M; Deforche B; Tanghe A; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Lenoir M; D'Hondt E
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Sep; 34(9):2635-41. PubMed ID: 23751303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response-repetition costs in choice-RT tasks: biased expectancies or response inhibition?
    Druey MD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():21-32. PubMed ID: 24269885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acting and anticipating: Impact of outcome-compatible distractor depends on response selection efficiency.
    Gozli DG; Huffman G; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1601-14. PubMed ID: 27280711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.