These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26301882)

  • 41. Evaluating and comparing biomarkers with respect to the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve in two-phase case-control studies.
    Huang Y
    Biostatistics; 2016 Jul; 17(3):499-522. PubMed ID: 26883772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Interpreting incremental value of markers added to risk prediction models.
    Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB; Pencina KM; Janssens AC; Greenland P
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 176(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 22875755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Combining risk markers improves cardiovascular risk prediction in women.
    Holewijn S; den Heijer M; Kiemeney LA; Stalenhoef AF; de Graaf J
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2014 Jan; 126(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23879211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.
    Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB; D'Agostino RB; Vasan RS
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):157-72; discussion 207-12. PubMed ID: 17569110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Semiparametric inference for surrogate endpoints with bivariate censored data.
    Ghosh D
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 17651457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Nested frailty models using maximum penalized likelihood estimation.
    Rondeau V; Filleul L; Joly P
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(23):4036-52. PubMed ID: 16463308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Dietary information improves cardiovascular disease risk prediction models.
    Baik I; Cho NH; Kim SH; Shin C
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2013 Jan; 67(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 23149979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Incorporating monotonicity into the evaluation of a biomarker.
    Ghosh D
    Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):402-13. PubMed ID: 16905591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Covariate-adjusted confidence interval for the intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Shoukri MM; Donner A; El-Dali A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Sep; 36(1):244-53. PubMed ID: 23871746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Confidence interval estimation for sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity for combined biomarkers.
    Tian L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):499-512. PubMed ID: 23611191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Application of net reclassification index to non-nested and point-based risk prediction models: a review.
    Thomas LE; O'Brien EC; Piccini JP; D'Agostino RB; Pencina MJ
    Eur Heart J; 2019 Jun; 40(23):1880-1887. PubMed ID: 29955849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quantile estimation of semiparametric model with time-varying coefficients for panel count data.
    Wang Y; Wang W
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261224. PubMed ID: 34898640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A minimal net reclassification improvement to assess predictions of intensive care mortality.
    Redondo YT; Lambert J; Chevret S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):413-29. PubMed ID: 23070594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Extending induced ROC methodology to the functional context.
    Inácio V; González-Manteiga W; Febrero-Bande M; Gude F; Alonzo TA; Cadarso-Suárez C
    Biostatistics; 2012 Sep; 13(4):594-608. PubMed ID: 22474123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Improvement of risk prediction by genomic profiling: reclassification measures versus the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
    Mihaescu R; van Zitteren M; van Hoek M; Sijbrands EJ; Uitterlinden AG; Witteman JC; Hofman A; Hunink MG; van Duijn CM; Janssens AC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 172(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 20562194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Simulation of complex data structures for planning of studies with focus on biomarker comparison.
    Schulz A; Zöller D; Nickels S; Beutel ME; Blettner M; Wild PS; Binder H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):90. PubMed ID: 28610631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Testing goodness of fit of parametric models for censored data.
    Nysen R; Aerts M; Faes C
    Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(21):2374-85. PubMed ID: 22714389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Prognostic relevance of baseline pro- and anti-inflammatory markers in STEMI: an APEX AMI substudy.
    van Diepen S; Newby LK; Lopes RD; Stebbins A; Hasselblad V; James S; Roe MT; Ezekowitz JA; Moliterno DJ; Neumann FJ; Reist C; Mahaffey KW; Hochman JS; Hamm CW; Armstrong PW; Granger CB; Theroux P;
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 168(3):2127-33. PubMed ID: 23394896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.