These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26302223)
1. Evaluation of low wind modeling approaches for two tall-stack databases. Paine R; Samani O; Kaplan M; Knipping E; Kumar N J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Nov; 65(11):1341-53. PubMed ID: 26302223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AERMOD performance evaluation for three coal-fired electrical generating units in Southwest Indiana. Frost KD J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Mar; 64(3):280-90. PubMed ID: 24701687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PRCI ambient NO Panek JA; McCarthy JM; Huth AZ; Krol AJ; Nowak C J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 May; 70(5):504-521. PubMed ID: 32186474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of NO2 predictions by the plume volume molar ratio method (PVMRM) and ozone limiting method (OLM) in AERMOD using new field observations. Hendrick EM; Tino VR; Hanna SR; Egan BA J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Jul; 63(7):844-54. PubMed ID: 23926853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and application of an aerosol screening model for size-resolved urban aerosols. Stanier CO; Lee SR; Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (179):3-79. PubMed ID: 25145039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. AERCOARE: An overwater meteorological preprocessor for AERMOD. Wong H; Elleman R; Wolvovsky E; Richmond K; Paumier J J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Nov; 66(11):1121-1140. PubMed ID: 27336680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined analysis of modeled and monitored SO2 concentrations at a complex smelting facility. Rehbein PJ; Kennedy MG; Cotsman DJ; Campeau MA; Greenfield MM; Annett MA; Lepage MF J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Mar; 64(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 24701686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Procedure to Select Meteorological Data for Air Dispersion Modeling of Pesticide Applications in California. Tao J; Vidrio E Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Jul; 15(4):648-658. PubMed ID: 30963708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Emissions variability processor (EMVAP): design, evaluation, and application. Paine R; Szembek C; Heinold D; Knipping E; Kumar N J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Dec; 64(12):1390-402. PubMed ID: 25562935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of AERMOD and WindTrax dispersion models in determining PM10 emission rates from a beef cattle feedlot. Bonifacio HF; Maghirang RG; Razote EB; Trabue SL; Prueger JH J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 May; 63(5):545-56. PubMed ID: 23786146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of model performance between AERMOD and AUSTAL2000. Langner C; Klemm O J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 Jun; 61(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 21751580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development, evaluation, and implementation of building downwash and plume rise enhancements in AERMOD. Petersen RL; Paumier JO; Guerra SA J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2022 Dec; 72(12):1423-1441. PubMed ID: 36070482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the complex terrain algorithms incorporated into two commonly used local-scale air pollution dispersion models (ADMS and AERMOD) using a hybrid model. Carruthers DJ; Seaton MD; McHugh CA; Sheng X; Solazzo E; Vanvyve E J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 Nov; 61(11):1227-35. PubMed ID: 22168106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Near-source air quality impact of a distributed natural gas combined heat and power facility. Yang B; Gu J; Zhang T; Zhang KM Environ Pollut; 2019 Mar; 246():650-657. PubMed ID: 30611941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of AERMOD and CALPUFF models for simulating SO2 concentrations in a gas refinery. Atabi F; Jafarigol F; Moattar F; Nouri J Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Sep; 188(9):516. PubMed ID: 27521001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dispersion of TSP and PM(10) emissions from quarries in complex terrain. Tartakovsky D; Stern E; Broday DM Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 542(Pt A):946-54. PubMed ID: 26562341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Industrial Source Complex Short-Term model: dispersion over terrain. Abdul-Wahab SA J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Apr; 54(4):396-408. PubMed ID: 15115368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimum turbulence assumptions and u* and L estimation for dispersion models during low-wind stable conditions. Hanna SR; Chowdhury B J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Mar; 64(3):309-21. PubMed ID: 24701689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of CO, CO Mousavi SS; Goudarzi G; Sabzalipour S; Rouzbahani MM; Mobarak Hassan E Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(40):56996-57008. PubMed ID: 34081282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Seasonal differences in SO2 ground-level impacts from a power plant plume on complex terrain. Palau JL; Meliá J; Segarra D; Pérez-Landa G; Santa-Cruz F; Millán MM Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Feb; 149(1-4):445-55. PubMed ID: 18264788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]