257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26302826)
21. Increasing Uptake of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in Cambodia Through a Voucher Program: Evidence From a Difference-in-Differences Analysis.
Bajracharya A; Veasnakiry L; Rathavy T; Bellows B
Glob Health Sci Pract; 2016 Aug; 4 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S109-21. PubMed ID: 27540118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Does healthcare voucher provision improve utilisation in the continuum of maternal care for poor pregnant women? Experience from Bangladesh.
Mahmood SS; Amos M; Hoque S; Mia MN; Chowdhury AH; Hanifi SMA; Iqbal M; Stones W; Pallikadavath S; Bhuiya A
Glob Health Action; 2019; 12(1):1701324. PubMed ID: 31825301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of the impact of the voucher and accreditation approach on improving reproductive behaviors and RH status: Bangladesh.
Rob U; Rahman M; Bellows B
BMC Public Health; 2011 Apr; 11():257. PubMed ID: 21513528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Redeeming qualities: exploring factors that affect women's use of reproductive health vouchers in Cambodia.
Brody CD; Freccero J; Brindis CD; Bellows B
BMC Int Health Hum Rights; 2013 Feb; 13():13. PubMed ID: 23442446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A taxonomy and results from a comprehensive review of 28 maternal health voucher programmes.
Bellows BW; Conlon CM; Higgs ES; Townsend JW; Nahed MG; Cavanaugh K; Grainger CG; Okal J; Gorter AC
J Health Popul Nutr; 2013 Dec; 31(4 Suppl 2):106-28. PubMed ID: 24992806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reproductive health voucher program and facility based delivery in informal settlements in Nairobi: a longitudinal analysis.
Amendah DD; Mutua MK; Kyobutungi C; Buliva E; Bellows B
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80582. PubMed ID: 24260426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. What is the long term impact of voucher scheme on primary care? Findings from a repeated cross sectional study using propensity score matching.
Yam CHK; Wong ELY; Fung VLH; Griffiths SM; Yeoh EK
BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Nov; 19(1):875. PubMed ID: 31752826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Can vouchers make a difference to the use of private primary care services by older people? Experience from the healthcare reform programme in Hong Kong.
Yam CH; Liu S; Huang OH; Yeoh EK; Griffiths SM
BMC Health Serv Res; 2011 Oct; 11():255. PubMed ID: 21978140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Who pays and how much? A cross-sectional study of out-of-pocket payment for modern contraception in Kenya.
Radovich E; Dennis ML; Barasa E; Cavallaro FL; Wong KL; Borghi J; Lynch CA; Lyons-Amos M; Abuya T; Benova L
BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e022414. PubMed ID: 30787074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessment of modern contraceptives continuation, switching and discontinuation among clients in Pakistan: study protocol of 24-months post family planning voucher intervention follow up.
Ali M; Azmat SK; Hamza HB
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 May; 18(1):359. PubMed ID: 29751807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Do we provide affordable, accessible and administrable health care? An assessment of SES differential in out of pocket expenditure on delivery care in India.
Pradhan J; Dwivedi R
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2017 Mar; 11():69-78. PubMed ID: 28159131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Vouchers for family planning and sexual and reproductive health services: a review of voucher programs involving Marie Stopes International among 11 Asian and African countries.
Eva G; Quinn A; Ngo TD
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Aug; 130 Suppl 3():E15-20. PubMed ID: 26165906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Out of pocket expenditure to deliver at public health facilities in India: a cross sectional analysis.
Issac A; Chatterjee S; Srivastava A; Bhattacharyya S
Reprod Health; 2016 Aug; 13(1):99. PubMed ID: 27557904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Can vouchers deliver? An evaluation of subsidies for maternal health care in Cambodia.
Van de Poel E; Flores G; Ir P; O'Donnell O; Van Doorslaer E
Bull World Health Organ; 2014 May; 92(5):331-9. PubMed ID: 24839322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predictors of high out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure: an analysis using Bangladesh household income and expenditure survey, 2010.
Molla AA; Chi C; Mondaca AL
BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jan; 17(1):94. PubMed ID: 28143517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Financial protection for health care expenses provided by public and private systems in Chile].
Gallegos E; Muñoz A
Rev Med Chil; 2018 Jun; 146(6):737-744. PubMed ID: 30148905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does a competitive voucher program for adolescents improve the quality of reproductive health care? A simulated patient study in Nicaragua.
Meuwissen LE; Gorter AC; Kester AD; Knottnerus JA
BMC Public Health; 2006 Aug; 6():204. PubMed ID: 16893463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of public subsidy for medical travel: does it protect against household impoverishment?
Suzana M; Walls H; Smith R; Hanefeld J
Int J Equity Health; 2018 Mar; 17(1):30. PubMed ID: 29510756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Utilization of the state led public private partnership program "Chiranjeevi Yojana" to promote facility births in Gujarat, India: a cross sectional community based study.
Yasobant S; Vora KS; Shewade HD; Annerstedt KS; Isaakidis P; Mavalankar DV; Dholakia NB; De Costa A
BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Jul; 16():266. PubMed ID: 27421254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is demand-side financing equity enhancing? Lessons from a maternal health voucher scheme in Bangladesh.
Ahmed S; Khan MM
Soc Sci Med; 2011 May; 72(10):1704-10. PubMed ID: 21546145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
