BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26303156)

  • 1. Sample size considerations for split-mouth design.
    Zhu H; Zhang S; Ahn C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2543-2551. PubMed ID: 26303156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reported methodological quality of split-mouth studies.
    Lesaffre E; Garcia Zattera MJ; Redmond C; Huber H; Needleman I;
    J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 34(9):756-61. PubMed ID: 17716311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A flexible sample size solution for longitudinal and crossover cluster randomized trials with continuous outcomes.
    Wang J; Cao J; Zhang S; Ahn C
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Oct; 109():106543. PubMed ID: 34450326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size considerations for paired experimental design with incomplete observations of continuous outcomes.
    Zhu H; Xu X; Ahn C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):589-598. PubMed ID: 28956503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size considerations for stratified cluster randomization design with binary outcomes and varying cluster size.
    Xu X; Zhu H; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3395-3404. PubMed ID: 31033011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Likelihood inference on the relative risk in split-cluster designs.
    Shoukri MM; Colak D; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 21335588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the analysis of composite measures of quality in medical research.
    Moineddin R; Meaney C; Grunfeld E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):633-660. PubMed ID: 25296866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal design of longitudinal data analysis using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Biom J; 2017 Mar; 59(2):315-330. PubMed ID: 27878852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size determinations for stepped-wedge clinical trials from a three-level data hierarchy perspective.
    Heo M; Kim N; Rinke ML; Wylie-Rosett J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):480-489. PubMed ID: 26988927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size determination for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Li F; Turner EL; Preisser JS
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1450-1458. PubMed ID: 29921006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size estimation for GEE method for comparing slopes in repeated measurements data.
    Jung SH; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1305-15. PubMed ID: 12687656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating relative risks in multicenter studies with a small number of centers - which methods to use? A simulation study.
    Pedroza C; Truong VTT
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):512. PubMed ID: 29096682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size calculation in three-level cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(24):3347-3372. PubMed ID: 32720717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size for a two-group comparison of repeated binary measurements using GEE.
    Jung SH; Ahn CW
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(17):2583-96. PubMed ID: 16118812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Urn models for response-adaptive randomized designs: a simulation study based on a non-adaptive randomized trial.
    Ghiglietti A; Scarale MG; Miceli R; Ieva F; Mariani L; Gavazzi C; Paganoni AM; Edefonti V
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1203-1215. PubMed ID: 29565749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linear mixed model approach to network meta-analysis for continuous outcomes in periodontal research.
    Tu YK
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Feb; 42(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 25581572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size considerations for matched-pair cluster randomization design with incomplete observations of continuous outcomes.
    Xu X; Zhu H; Ahn C
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 May; 104():106336. PubMed ID: 33689919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal designs in three-level cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.
    Liu J; Liu L; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(20):3733-3746. PubMed ID: 31162709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power and sample size requirements for GEE analyses of cluster randomized crossover trials.
    Li F; Forbes AB; Turner EL; Preisser JS
    Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(4):636-649. PubMed ID: 30298551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of intervention effects in split-mouth and parallel-arm randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Smaïl-Faugeron V; Fron-Chabouis H; Courson F; Durieux P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 May; 14():64. PubMed ID: 24886043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.