These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

526 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26303655)

  • 1. Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure.
    Demarco FF; Collares K; Coelho-de-Souza FH; Correa MB; Cenci MS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ
    Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1214-24. PubMed ID: 26303655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term survival and reasons for failure in direct anterior composite restorations: A systematic review.
    Shah YR; Shiraguppi VL; Deosarkar BA; Shelke UR
    J Conserv Dent; 2021; 24(5):415-420. PubMed ID: 35399771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults – A systematic review.
    Ástvaldsdóttir Á; Dagerhamn J; van Dijken JW; Naimi-Akbar A; Sandborgh-Englund G; Tranæus S; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2015 Aug; 43(8):934-54. PubMed ID: 26003655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between published clinical success of direct resin composite restorations in vital posterior teeth in 1995-2005 and 2006-2016 periods.
    Alvanforoush N; Palamara J; Wong RH; Burrow MF
    Aust Dent J; 2017 Jun; 62(2):132-145. PubMed ID: 27861960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The long-term results of teeth restoration with composite resin materials: a systematic literature review].
    Kodzaeva ZS; Turkina AY; Doroshina VY
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2019; 98(3):117-122. PubMed ID: 31322607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations--a meta-analysis.
    Heintze SD; Rousson V; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2015 May; 31(5):481-95. PubMed ID: 25773188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Failure rate of single-unit restorations on posterior vital teeth: A systematic review.
    Afrashtehfar KI; Emami E; Ahmadi M; Eilayyan O; Abi-Nader S; Tamimi F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):345-353.e8. PubMed ID: 27765400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are there universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior teeth?
    Baldissera RA; Corrêa MB; Schuch HS; Collares K; Nascimento GG; Jardim PS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):1027-35. PubMed ID: 24001506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: resin composite.
    Sharif MO; Catleugh M; Merry A; Tickle M; Dunne SM; Brunton P; Aggarwal VR; Chong LY
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; 2014(2):CD005971. PubMed ID: 24510679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures.
    Chisini LA; Collares K; Cademartori MG; de Oliveira LJC; Conde MCM; Demarco FF; Corrêa MB
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2018 Mar; 28(2):123-139. PubMed ID: 29322626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rehabilitation of severely worn teeth: A systematic review.
    Mesko ME; Sarkis-Onofre R; Cenci MS; Opdam NJ; Loomans B; Pereira-Cenci T
    J Dent; 2016 May; 48():9-15. PubMed ID: 26965079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 5.5-year-survival of CAD/CAM resin-based composite restorations in severe tooth wear patients.
    Maier E; Crins L; Pereira-Cenci T; Bronkhorst E; Opdam N; Galler K; Loomans B
    Dent Mater; 2024 May; 40(5):767-776. PubMed ID: 38458918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
    Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longevity of composite restorations is definitely not only about materials.
    Demarco FF; Cenci MS; Montagner AF; de Lima VP; Correa MB; Moraes RR; Opdam NJM
    Dent Mater; 2023 Jan; 39(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 36494241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.