672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26303719)
21. Quantitative evaluation of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient values on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict higher Gleason score prostate cancer.
Kato S; Kamijima S; Inaoka T; Kamiya N; Sasai D; Terada H; Hiruta N; Suzuki H
Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 29939084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Initial experience with identifying high-grade prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in patients with a Gleason score ≤ 3 + 3 = 6 upon schematic TRUS-guided biopsy: a radical prostatectomy correlated series.
Somford DM; Hambrock T; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Fütterer JJ; van Oort IM; van Basten JP; Karthaus HF; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Invest Radiol; 2012 Mar; 47(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 22293513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. 1.5-T multiparametric MRI using PI-RADS: a region by region analysis to localize the index-tumor of prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostatectomy.
Reisæter LA; Fütterer JJ; Halvorsen OJ; Nygård Y; Biermann M; Andersen E; Gravdal K; Haukaas S; Monssen JA; Huisman HJ; Akslen LA; Beisland C; Rørvik J
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 24819231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Multiparametric MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Accuracy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; D'Urso D; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M; Russo G; Sabini MG; Valastro LM; Galia A; Fraggetta F
In Vivo; 2017; 31(3):415-418. PubMed ID: 28438871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer Using the Combination of Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Across Tumor Diffusion Volume and Clinical Information: A Pilot Study.
Zhang Z; Xu H; Xue Y; Li J; Ye Q
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):556-564. PubMed ID: 30173421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of the potential of diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer detection.
Morgan VA; Kyriazi S; Ashley SE; DeSouza NM
Acta Radiol; 2007 Jul; 48(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 17611881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v1.
Polanec S; Helbich TH; Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Georg D; Shariat SF; Aulitzky W; Susani M; Baltzer PA
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27161062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Preoperative prediction of neurovascular bundle involvement of localized prostate cancer by combined T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging of magnetic resonance imaging, number of positive biopsy cores, and Gleason score.
Naiki T; Okamura T; Nagata D; Mori Y; Kawai N; Ogawa K; Akita H; Hashimoto Y; Tozawa K; Kohri K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 21790224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Integration of MRI to clinical nomogram for predicting pathological stage before radical prostatectomy.
Lebacle C; Roudot-Thoraval F; Moktefi A; Bouanane M; De La Taille A; Salomon L
World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1409-1415. PubMed ID: 27995303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 1 and 2 for the Detection of Peripheral Zone Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Cancers.
Krishna S; McInnes M; Lim C; Lim R; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):W365-W373. PubMed ID: 28981356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Can DW-MRI, with its ADC values, be a reliable predictor of biopsy outcome in patients with suspected prostate cancer?
Faletti R; Battisti G; Discalzi A; Grognardi ML; Martinello S; Oderda M; Gontero P; Bergamasco L; Cassinis MC; Fonio P
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):926-33. PubMed ID: 27193791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diffusion-weighted MRI as a predictor of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer.
Kim CK; Park SY; Park JJ; Park BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W270-6. PubMed ID: 24555624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. What is the most effective tool for detecting prostate cancer using a standard MR scanner?
Osugi K; Tanimoto A; Nakashima J; Shinoda K; Hashiguchi A; Oya M; Jinzaki M; Kuribayashi S
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2013 Dec; 12(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 24172787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with persistently elevated PSA and tumor-negative biopsy in ambulatory care: performance of MR imaging in a multi-reader environment.
Scheidler J; Weöres I; Brinkschmidt C; Zeitler H; Panzer S; Scharf M; Heuck A; Siebels M
Rofo; 2012 Feb; 184(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 22274854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Apparent diffusion coefficient values are superior to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy for the assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness.
Li C; Chen M; Wang J; Wang X; Zhang W; Zhang C
Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):232-239. PubMed ID: 27055916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinically insignificant prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance according to Prostate Cancer Research International: Active surveillance criteria: Utility of PI-RADS v2.
Yim JH; Kim CK; Kim JH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1072-1079. PubMed ID: 28901655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prostate Cancer: Utility of Whole-Lesion Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Metrics for Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
Rosenkrantz AB; Ream JM; Nolan P; Rusinek H; Deng FM; Taneja SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1208-14. PubMed ID: 26587927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is there an additional value of ¹¹C-choline PET-CT to T2-weighted MRI images in the localization of intraprostatic tumor nodules?
Van den Bergh L; Koole M; Isebaert S; Joniau S; Deroose CM; Oyen R; Lerut E; Budiharto T; Mottaghy F; Bormans G; Van Poppel H; Haustermans K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):1486-92. PubMed ID: 22284686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
