851 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26303761)
1. Japanese population norms for preference-based measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D.
Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T; Ikeda S; Igarashi A; Noto S; Saito S; Shimozuma K
Qual Life Res; 2016 Mar; 25(3):707-19. PubMed ID: 26303761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation.
Wong CKH; Lang BHH; Yu HMS; Lam CLK
Patient; 2017 Aug; 10(4):447-454. PubMed ID: 28224296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the preference-based EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
Yang F; Lau T; Lee E; Vathsala A; Chia KS; Luo N
Eur J Health Econ; 2015 Dec; 16(9):1019-26. PubMed ID: 25519850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.
Cheung PWH; Wong CKH; Cheung JPY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jun; 44(11):E679-E686. PubMed ID: 30475342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Population Norms for the EQ-5D-5L, PROPr and SF-6D in Hungary.
Nikl A; Janssen MF; Jenei B; Brodszky V; Rencz F
Pharmacoeconomics; 2024 May; 42(5):583-603. PubMed ID: 38416366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D in the general population of Chengdu city in China.
Zhao L; Liu X; Liu D; He Y; Liu Z; Li N
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Mar; 98(11):e14719. PubMed ID: 30882636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare?
Feng Y; Devlin N; Herdman M
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Oct; 13():171. PubMed ID: 26489956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A vision 'bolt-on' increases the responsiveness of EQ-5D: preliminary evidence from a study of cataract surgery.
Gandhi M; Ang M; Teo K; Wong CW; Wei YC; Tan RL; Janssen MF; Luo N
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jun; 21(4):501-511. PubMed ID: 31902023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. VALIDATION AND COMPARISON OF EQ-5D-3L AND SF-6D INSTRUMENTS IN A SPANISH PARKINSON´S DISEASE POPULATION SAMPLE.
Garcia-Gordillo MÁ; Del Pozo-Cruz B; Adsuar JC; Cordero-Ferrera JM; Abellan-Perpiñan JM; Sanchez-Martinez FI
Nutr Hosp; 2015 Dec; 32(6):2808-21. PubMed ID: 26667738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EQ-5D-5L is More Responsive than EQ-5D-3L to Treatment Benefit of Cataract Surgery.
Gandhi M; Ang M; Teo K; Wong CW; Wei YC; Tan RL; Janssen MF; Luo N
Patient; 2019 Aug; 12(4):383-392. PubMed ID: 30607809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparison of EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D Utilities of Patients with Musculoskeletal Disorders of Different Severity: A Health-Related Quality of Life Approach.
Kontodimopoulos N; Stamatopoulou E; Gazi S; Moschou D; Krikelis M; Talias MA
J Clin Med; 2022 Jul; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 35887861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of measurement properties between UK SF-6D and English EQ-5D-5L and Thai EQ-5D-5L value sets in general Thai population.
Kangwanrattanakul K
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2021 Aug; 21(4):765-774. PubMed ID: 32981380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of Chinese medicine quality of life assessment scale (CQ-11D) and EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D scales based on Chinese population.
Zhou J; Xu L; Pan J; Wang M; Zhou P; Wang W; Lu S; Zhu W
Qual Life Res; 2024 Jan; 33(1):113-122. PubMed ID: 37695478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of EQ-5D-5L, VAS, and SF-6D in Thai Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.
Thaweethamcharoen T; Noparatayaporn P; Sritippayawan S; Aiyasanon N
Value Health Reg Issues; 2019 May; 18():59-64. PubMed ID: 30502661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are condition-specific utilities more valid than generic preference-based ones in asthma? Evidence from a study comparing EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D with AQL-5D.
Kontodimopoulos N; Stamatopoulou E; Brinia A; Talias MA; Ferreira LN
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2018 Dec; 18(6):667-675. PubMed ID: 30048194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D among patients with haemophilia.
Xu RH; Dong D; Luo N; Wong EL; Wu Y; Yu S; Yang R; Liu J; Yuan H; Zhang S
Eur J Health Econ; 2021 Jun; 22(4):547-557. PubMed ID: 33761029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative performance of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D index scores in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Sayah FA; Qiu W; Xie F; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2017 Aug; 26(8):2057-2066. PubMed ID: 28364183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D responses using scoring algorithms derived from similar valuation exercises.
Whitehurst DG; Norman R; Brazier JE; Viney R
Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):570-7. PubMed ID: 25128050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in Dutch patients with fractures visiting a Fracture Liaison Service.
Li N; Boonen A; van den Bergh JP; van Kuijk SMJ; Wyers CE; van Oostwaard M; Vranken L; Bours SPG; Hiligsmann M
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):829-839. PubMed ID: 35674412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life questionnaire in self-reported diabetes: evidence from a general population survey.
Jankowska A; Młyńczak K; Golicki D
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 May; 19(1):138. PubMed ID: 33952271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
