190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26303794)
1. Impact of arterial input function selection on the accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI quantitative analysis for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Azahaf M; Haberlay M; Betrouni N; Ernst O; Behal H; Duhamel A; Ouzzane A; Puech P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):737-49. PubMed ID: 26303794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer DCE-MRI at 3T: comparison of two arterial input functions on cancer detection with digitized whole mount histopathological validation.
Fennessy FM; Fedorov A; Penzkofer T; Kim KW; Hirsch MS; Vangel MG; Masry P; Flood TA; Chang MC; Tempany CM; Mulkern RV; Gupta SN
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 33(7):886-94. PubMed ID: 25683515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between population average and experimentally measured arterial input function in predicting biopsy results in prostate cancer.
Meng R; Chang SD; Jones EC; Goldenberg SL; Kozlowski P
Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):520-5. PubMed ID: 20074982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameter estimation on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate: Preliminary evaluation of a novel AIF-free estimation method.
Ginsburg SB; Taimen P; Merisaari H; Vainio P; Boström PJ; Aronen HJ; Jambor I; Madabhushi A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 27285161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.
Rata M; Collins DJ; Darcy J; Messiou C; Tunariu N; Desouza N; Young H; Leach MO; Orton MR
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26385804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer.
Li X; Welch EB; Arlinghaus LR; Chakravarthy AB; Xu L; Farley J; Loveless ME; Mayer IA; Kelley MC; Meszoely IM; Means-Powell JA; Abramson VG; Grau AM; Gore JC; Yankeelov TE
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5753-69. PubMed ID: 21841212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis.
Mehrabian H; Da Rosa M; Haider MA; Martel AL
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 26297961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating the arterial input function from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data with compensation for flow enhancement (II): Applications in spine diagnostics and assessment of crohn's disease.
van Schie JJN; Lavini C; van Vliet LJ; Kramer G; Pieters-van den Bos I; Marcus JT; Stoker J; Vos FM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1197-1204. PubMed ID: 29193469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge, Part II.
Huang W; Chen Y; Fedorov A; Li X; Jajamovich GH; Malyarenko DI; Aryal MP; LaViolette PS; Oborski MJ; O'Sullivan F; Abramson RG; Jafari-Khouzani K; Afzal A; Tudorica A; Moloney B; Gupta SN; Besa C; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Mountz JM; Laymon CM; Muzi M; Kinahan PE; Schmainda K; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Taouli B; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy F; Li X
Tomography; 2019 Mar; 5(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 30854447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic individual arterial input functions calculated from PCA outperform manual and population-averaged approaches for the pharmacokinetic modeling of DCE-MR images.
Sanz-Requena R; Prats-Montalbán JM; Martí-Bonmatí L; Alberich-Bayarri Á; García-Martí G; Pérez R; Ferrer A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(2):477-87. PubMed ID: 25410482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Arterial input functions in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: which model performs best when assessing breast cancer response?
Woolf DK; Taylor NJ; Makris A; Tunariu N; Collins DJ; Li SP; Ah-See ML; Beresford M; Padhani AR
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20150961. PubMed ID: 27187599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.
Mazaheri Y; Kim N; Lakhman Y; Jafari R; Vargas A; Otazo R
NMR Biomed; 2022 Jul; 35(7):e4718. PubMed ID: 35226774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the arterial input function in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI by fitting the signal in the complex plane.
Simonis FF; Sbrizzi A; Beld E; Lagendijk JJ; van den Berg CA
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1236-45. PubMed ID: 26525012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of artery input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for determining grades of gliomas.
Jia L; Wu X; Wan Q; Wan L; Jia W; Zhang N
Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20200699. PubMed ID: 33332981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of arterial input function (AIF) on quantitative prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and zonal prostate anatomy.
Ziayee F; Müller-Lutz A; Gross J; Quentin M; Ullrich T; Heusch P; Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Wittsack HJ; Schimmöller L
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 53():28-33. PubMed ID: 29902565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving the Reliability of Pharmacokinetic Parameters at Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Astrocytomas: A Deep Learning Approach.
Choi KS; You SH; Han Y; Ye JC; Jeong B; Choi SH
Radiology; 2020 Oct; 297(1):178-188. PubMed ID: 32749203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relative sensitivities of DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters to arterial input function (AIF) scaling.
Li X; Cai Y; Moloney B; Chen Y; Huang W; Woods M; Coakley FV; Rooney WD; Garzotto MG; Springer CS
J Magn Reson; 2016 Aug; 269():104-112. PubMed ID: 27288764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
