These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26304103)

  • 21. Intersphincteric Resection Has Similar Long-term Oncologic Outcomes Compared With Abdominoperineal Resection for Low Rectal Cancer Without Preoperative Therapy: Results of Propensity Score Analyses.
    Tsukamoto S; Miyake M; Shida D; Ochiai H; Yamada K; Kanemitsu Y
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Sep; 61(9):1035-1042. PubMed ID: 30086052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on the rates of sphincter preserving surgery in lower rectal cancer and analysis of their prognostic factors].
    Wang XJ; Chi P; Lin HM; Lu XR; Huang Y; Xu ZB; Huang SH; Sun YW; Ye DX
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 54(6):419-423. PubMed ID: 27938574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic-assisted Resection or Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: The Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Stevenson ARL; Solomon MJ; Brown CSB; Lumley JW; Hewett P; Clouston AD; Gebski VJ; Wilson K; Hague W; Simes J;
    Ann Surg; 2019 Apr; 269(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 30247332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laparoscopic proctectomy after neoadjuvant therapy: safety and long-term follow-up.
    Cone MM; Lu KC; Herzig DO; Rea JD; Diggs BS; Oommen SC
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Jun; 25(6):1902-6. PubMed ID: 21184113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Dural AC; Keskin M; Balik E; Akici M; Kunduz E; Yamaner S; Asoglu O; Gulluoglu M; Bugra D
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2015 Apr; 25(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 25159046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Fleshman J; Branda ME; Sargent DJ; Boller AM; George VV; Abbas MA; Peters WR; Maun DC; Chang GJ; Herline A; Fichera A; Mutch MG; Wexner SD; Whiteford MH; Marks J; Birnbaum E; Margolin DA; Larson DW; Marcello PW; Posner MC; Read TE; Monson JRT; Wren SM; Pisters PWT; Nelson H
    Ann Surg; 2019 Apr; 269(4):589-595. PubMed ID: 30080730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Short-term follow-up after laparoscopic versus conventional total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer in a large teaching hospital.
    Schiphorst AH; Doeksen A; Hamaker ME; Zimmerman DD; Pronk A
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Jan; 29(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 24043266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus the open approach in curative resection of rectal cancer.
    Liu FL; Lin JJ; Ye F; Teng LS
    J Int Med Res; 2010; 38(3):916-22. PubMed ID: 20819427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Efficacy analysis of suprapubic single-incision laparoscopy in the treatment of rectosigmoid cancer].
    Liu R; Wang Y; Xiong W; Zhang Z; Deng H; Li G
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 27353098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes.
    Yoo BE; Cho JS; Shin JW; Lee DW; Kwak JM; Kim J; Kim SH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 25326398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
    Zhou ZX; Zhao LY; Lin T; Liu H; Deng HJ; Zhu HL; Yan J; Li GX
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(18):5505-12. PubMed ID: 25987773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial.
    Kang SB; Park JW; Jeong SY; Nam BH; Choi HS; Kim DW; Lim SB; Lee TG; Kim DY; Kim JS; Chang HJ; Lee HS; Kim SY; Jung KH; Hong YS; Kim JH; Sohn DK; Kim DH; Oh JH
    Lancet Oncol; 2010 Jul; 11(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 20610322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Potential sexual function improvement by using transanal mesorectal approach for laparoscopic low rectal cancer excision.
    Pontallier A; Denost Q; Van Geluwe B; Adam JP; Celerier B; Rullier E
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Nov; 30(11):4924-4933. PubMed ID: 26944728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer.
    Denost Q; Adam JP; Pontallier A; Celerier B; Laurent C; Rullier E
    Ann Surg; 2015 Jan; 261(1):138-43. PubMed ID: 25185482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting.
    Kellokumpu IH; Kairaluoma MI; Nuorva KP; Kautiainen HJ; Jantunen IT
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Aug; 55(8):854-63. PubMed ID: 22810470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
    Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Organ preservation for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision (ACOSOG Z6041): results of an open-label, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 trial.
    Garcia-Aguilar J; Renfro LA; Chow OS; Shi Q; Carrero XW; Lynn PB; Thomas CR; Chan E; Cataldo PA; Marcet JE; Medich DS; Johnson CS; Oommen SC; Wolff BG; Pigazzi A; McNevin SM; Pons RK; Bleday R
    Lancet Oncol; 2015 Nov; 16(15):1537-1546. PubMed ID: 26474521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
    Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Oncologic outcomes and perioperative clinicopathologic results after robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Baik SH; Kim NK; Lim DR; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2625-32. PubMed ID: 23417433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.