These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26304218)

  • 21. [Analysis of disyllabic mandarin speech test results of normal hearing persons with different ages].
    Wang Y; Zhang H; Tong J; Guo J; Zheng Z; Wu W; Chen J; Li Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(7):312-5. PubMed ID: 22737873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identification of pseudohypacusis using speech recognition thresholds.
    Schlauch RS; Arnce KD; Olson LM; Sanchez S; Doyle TN
    Ear Hear; 1996 Jun; 17(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 8807265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of a Zulu speech reception threshold test for Zulu first language speakers in Kwa Zulu-Natal.
    Panday S; Kathard H; Pillay M; Govender C
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2007; 54():111-22. PubMed ID: 18240666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Otitis media with effusion in children: Cross-frequency correlation in pure tone audiometry.
    Chow AHC; Cai T; McPherson B; Yang F
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221405. PubMed ID: 31437206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Discrimination of degrees of auditory performance from the digits-in-noise test based on hearing status.
    Armstrong NM; Oosterloo BC; Croll PH; Ikram MA; Goedegebure A
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 59(12):897-904. PubMed ID: 32673129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone.
    Smits C; Kapteyn TS; Houtgast T
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Jan; 43(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 14974624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Psychometrically Equivalent Fante Speech Recognition Threshold Materials by a Female Talker.
    Honu-Mensah CM; Offei YN; Owusu NAV; Anim-Sampong S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 May; 66(5):1842-1852. PubMed ID: 36989178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
    Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Hearing Loss and Speech Recognition in the Elderly].
    von Gablenz P; Holube I
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2017 Nov; 96(11):759-764. PubMed ID: 29132188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of the CID W22 as a South African English speech discrimination test.
    Wilson WJ; Moodley S
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2000; 47():57-62. PubMed ID: 11455824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Proficiency in English sentence stress production by Cantonese speakers who speak English as a second language (ESL).
    Ng ML; Chen Y
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Dec; 13(6):526-35. PubMed ID: 21793782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reference sound pressure level for Korean speech audiometry.
    Han H; Lee J; Cho S; Kim J; Lee K; Choi WD
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 21047297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of American Speech-Language Hearing Association guidelines for obtaining speech-recognition thresholds.
    Jahner JA; Schlauch RA; Doyle T
    Ear Hear; 1994 Aug; 15(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 7958531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. STARR: a speech test for evaluation of the effectiveness of auditory prostheses under realistic conditions.
    Boyle PJ; Nunn TB; O'Connor AF; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 23135616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimal and Mild Hearing Loss in Children: Association with Auditory Perception, Cognition, and Communication Problems.
    Moore DR; Zobay O; Ferguson MA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):720-732. PubMed ID: 31633598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relationships between speech recognition threshold, average hearing level, and speech importance noise detection threshold.
    Letowski T; Hergenreder P; Tang H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Oct; 35(5):1131-6. PubMed ID: 1447923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss.
    De Sousa KC; Smits C; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):801-808. PubMed ID: 32609044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.