These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26305741)

  • 1. Patient Perspectives on the Learning Health System: The Importance of Trust and Shared Decision Making.
    Kelley M; James C; Alessi Kraft S; Korngiebel D; Wijangco I; Rosenthal E; Joffe S; Cho MK; Wilfond B; Lee SS
    Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(9):4-17. PubMed ID: 26305741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country.
    Murgic L; Hébert PC; Sovic S; Pavlekovic G
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16(1):65. PubMed ID: 26420014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.
    Spencer K; Sanders C; Whitley EA; Lund D; Kaye J; Dixon WG
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Apr; 18(4):e66. PubMed ID: 27083521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aligning ethics with medical decision-making: the quest for informed patient choice.
    Moulton B; King JS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 20446987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical decision and patient's preference: 'much ethics' and more trust always needed.
    Anyfantakis D; Symvoulakis EK
    Int J Med Sci; 2011; 8(4):351-2. PubMed ID: 21647328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making research a requirement of treatment: why we should sometimes let doctors pressure patients to participate in research.
    Orentlicher D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):20-8. PubMed ID: 16295261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indifference of subjects: an alternative to equipoise in randomized clinical trials.
    Veatch RM
    Soc Philos Policy; 2002; 19(2):295-323. PubMed ID: 12678091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kenyan health stakeholder views on individual consent, general notification and governance processes for the re-use of hospital inpatient data to support learning on healthcare systems.
    Mbuthia D; Molyneux S; Njue M; Mwalukore S; Marsh V
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):3. PubMed ID: 30621693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Default Position: Optimizing Pediatric Participation in Medical Decision Making.
    Olszewski AE; Goldkind SF
    Am J Bioeth; 2018 Mar; 18(3):4-9. PubMed ID: 29466136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What perceptions do patients have of decision making (DM)? Toward an integrative patient-centered care model. A qualitative study using focus-group interviews.
    Moreau A; Carol L; Dedianne MC; Dupraz C; Perdrix C; Lainé X; Souweine G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 May; 87(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 21903355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The place of consent in relationships between physicians and patients: a philosophical point of view].
    Marzano M
    Presse Med; 2013 Jan; 42(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 23044378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should Physicians Attempt to Persuade a Patient to Accept a Compromised Organ for Transplant?
    Tully AA; Diaz GC; Renz JF
    AMA J Ethics; 2016 Feb; 18(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 26894805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Reciprocal acknowledgement and decision-making shared with the patient].
    Costa-Alcaraz AM; Siurana-Aparisi JC; Almendro-Padilla C; García-Vicente S; Ordovás-Casaurrán R
    Rev Clin Esp; 2011 Dec; 211(11):581-6. PubMed ID: 22088666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring service users', carers' and professionals' perspectives and experiences of current antipsychotic prescribing: A qualitative study.
    Harris K; Brooks H; Lythgoe G; Bee P; Lovell K; Drake RJ
    Chronic Illn; 2017 Dec; 13(4):275-287. PubMed ID: 29119866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informed consent in the Pakistani milieu: the physician's perspective.
    Jafarey AM; Farooqui A
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Feb; 31(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 15681673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized, controlled trials in the emergency setting: a matter of physician-patient relationships, responsibility, and trust.
    Bos AP; van Zwieten MC
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Mar; 35(3):979-80. PubMed ID: 17421105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transparency and self-censorship in shared decision-making.
    Brody H
    Am J Bioeth; 2007 Jul; 7(7):44-6. PubMed ID: 17654386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The practice of autonomy and the practice of bioethics.
    Schneider CE
    J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 12235687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research.
    Kraft SA; Cho MK; Gillespie K; Halley M; Varsava N; Ormond KE; Luft HS; Wilfond BS; Soo-Jin Lee S
    Am J Bioeth; 2018 Apr; 18(4):3-20. PubMed ID: 29621457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shared decision-making in primary care: tailoring the Charles et al. model to fit the context of general practice.
    Murray E; Charles C; Gafni A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Aug; 62(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 16139467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.