BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26305773)

  • 1. Fractal analysis: fractal dimension and lacunarity from MR images for differentiating the grades of glioma.
    Smitha KA; Gupta AK; Jayasree RS
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(17):6937-47. PubMed ID: 26305773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MR imaging based fractal analysis for differentiating primary CNS lymphoma and glioblastoma.
    Liu S; Fan X; Zhang C; Wang Z; Li S; Wang Y; Qiu X; Jiang T
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 30167811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance imaging-based 3-dimensional fractal dimension and lacunarity analyses may predict the meningioma grade.
    Park YW; Kim S; Ahn SS; Han K; Kang SG; Chang JH; Kim SH; Lee SK; Park SH
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4615-4622. PubMed ID: 32274524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional susceptibility-weighted imaging at 7 T using fractal-based quantitative analysis to grade gliomas.
    Di Ieva A; Göd S; Grabner G; Grizzi F; Sherif C; Matula C; Tschabitscher M; Trattnig S
    Neuroradiology; 2013 Jan; 55(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 22903580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic Value of Fractal Analysis for the Differentiation of Brain Tumors Using 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging.
    Di Ieva A; Le Reste PJ; Carsin-Nicol B; Ferre JC; Cusimano MD
    Neurosurgery; 2016 Dec; 79(6):839-846. PubMed ID: 27332779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computational quantitative MR image features - a potential useful tool in differentiating glioblastoma from solitary brain metastasis.
    Petrujkić K; Milošević N; Rajković N; Stanisavljević D; Gavrilović S; Dželebdžić D; Ilić R; Di Ieva A; Maksimović R
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 119():108634. PubMed ID: 31473463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of fractal dimension and lacunarity in the characterization of mast cell degranulation in rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss).
    Manera M; Dezfuli BS; Borreca C; Giari L
    J Microsc; 2014 Nov; 256(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 25087582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas.
    Server A; Kulle B; Gadmar ØB; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 20708868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Demystifying neuroblastoma malignancy through fractal dimension, entropy, and lacunarity.
    Donato I; Velpula KK; Tsung AJ; Tuszynski JA; Sergi CM
    Tumori; 2023 Aug; 109(4):370-378. PubMed ID: 36645143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fractal dimension and lacunarity analysis of dental radiographs.
    Yasar F; Akgünlü F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Sep; 34(5):261-7. PubMed ID: 16120874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.
    Guo Q; Shao J; Ruiz VF
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2009 Jan; 4(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 20033598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic performance of texture analysis on MRI in grading cerebral gliomas.
    Skogen K; Schulz A; Dormagen JB; Ganeshan B; Helseth E; Server A
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):824-9. PubMed ID: 26971430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fractal dimension and lacunarity analysis of retinal microvascular morphology in hypertension and diabetes.
    Popovic N; Radunovic M; Badnjar J; Popovic T
    Microvasc Res; 2018 Jul; 118():36-43. PubMed ID: 29476757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FRACTAL DIMENSIONS OF HUMAN CEREBELLUM: IMPACT OF IMAGE PREPROCESSING AND FRACTAL ANALYSIS METHODS.
    Maryenko NI; Stepanenko OY
    Wiad Lek; 2022; 75(2):438-443. PubMed ID: 35307673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative percentage signal intensity recovery of perfusion metrics—an efficient tool for differentiating grades of glioma.
    Smitha KA; Gupta AK; Jayasree RS
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Aug; 88(1052):20140784. PubMed ID: 26110202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fractal signature and lacunarity in the measurement of the texture of trabecular bone in clinical CT images.
    Dougherty G; Henebry GM
    Med Eng Phys; 2001 Jul; 23(6):369-80. PubMed ID: 11551813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EUS elastography (strain ratio) and fractal-based quantitative analysis for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Carrara S; Di Leo M; Grizzi F; Correale L; Rahal D; Anderloni A; Auriemma F; Fugazza A; Preatoni P; Maselli R; Hassan C; Finati E; Mangiavillano B; Repici A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jun; 87(6):1464-1473. PubMed ID: 29329992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fractal dimension in human cerebellum measured by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Liu JZ; Zhang LD; Yue GH
    Biophys J; 2003 Dec; 85(6):4041-6. PubMed ID: 14645092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grading glial tumors with amide proton transfer MR imaging: different analytical approaches.
    Sakata A; Okada T; Yamamoto A; Kanagaki M; Fushimi Y; Okada T; Dodo T; Arakawa Y; Schmitt B; Miyamoto S; Togashi K
    J Neurooncol; 2015 Apr; 122(2):339-48. PubMed ID: 25559689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fractal dimension of trabecular bone: comparison of three histomorphometric computed techniques for measuring the architectural two-dimensional complexity.
    Chappard D; Legrand E; Haettich B; Chalès G; Auvinet B; Eschard JP; Hamelin JP; Baslé MF; Audran M
    J Pathol; 2001 Nov; 195(4):515-21. PubMed ID: 11745685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.