These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2630619)

  • 1. Assessment of curette sharpness.
    Hoffman LA; Gross KB; Cobb CM; Pippin DJ; Tira DE; Overman PR
    J Dent Hyg; 1989 Oct; 63(8):382-7. PubMed ID: 2630619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of different sharpening stones on periodontal curettes evaluated by scanning electron microscopy.
    Huang CC; Tseng CC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1991 Aug; 90(8):782-7. PubMed ID: 1683373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of wear of dental curettes during standardized root planing.
    Tal H; Panno JM; Vaidyanathan TK
    J Periodontol; 1985 Sep; 56(9):532-6. PubMed ID: 3897505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of wear of stainless steel and high carbon steel curettes.
    Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Green E; Gabbay M
    J Periodontol; 1989 Jun; 60(6):320-4. PubMed ID: 2674396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scanning electron microscope assessment of several resharpening techniques on the cutting edges of Gracey curettes.
    Andrade Acevedo RA; Cézar Sampaio JE; Shibli JA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(7):70-7. PubMed ID: 17994157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Molar furcation entrance and its relation to the width of curette blades used in periodontal mechanical therapy.
    dos Santos KM; Pinto SC; Pochapski MT; Wambier DS; Pilatti GL; Santos FA
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2009 Nov; 7(4):263-9. PubMed ID: 19832913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of three different manual techniques of sharpening curettes through a scanning electron microscope: a randomized controlled experimental study.
    Di Fiore A; Mazzoleni S; Fantin F; Favero L; De Francesco M; Stellini E
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 25382386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A quantitative study of cementum removal with hand curettes.
    Coldiron NB; Yukna RA; Weir J; Caudill RF
    J Periodontol; 1990 May; 61(5):293-9. PubMed ID: 2352106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sharpening of periodontal instruments with different sharpening stones and its influence upon root debridement--scanning electronic microscopy assessment.
    Silva MV; Gomes DA; Leite FR; Sampaio JE; de Toledo BE; Mendes AJ
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 8(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16459885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subgingival debridement with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments and assessment of substance removal on extracted teeth.
    Rühling A; Bernhardt O; Kocher T
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jun; 36(6):446-52. PubMed ID: 15954250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of repeated sterilization and ultrasonic cleaning on curet blades.
    Stach DJ; Cross-Poline GN; Newman SM; Tilliss TS
    J Dent Hyg; 1995; 69(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 8632200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Root surface removal and resultant surface texture with diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts: an in vitro and SEM study.
    Vastardis S; Yukna RA; Rice DA; Mercante D
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 15842261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments.
    Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.
    Solís Moreno C; Santos A; Nart J; Levi P; Velásquez A; Sanz Moliner J
    J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical attachment loss produced by curettes and ultrasonic scalers.
    Alves RV; Machion L; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum EA; Sallum AW
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Jul; 32(7):691-4. PubMed ID: 15966872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study.
    Silva D; Martins O; Matos S; Lopes P; Rolo T; Baptista I
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative effectiveness of hand and ultrasonic instrumentations in root surface planing in vitro.
    Khosravi M; Bahrami ZS; Atabaki MS; Shokrgozar MA; Shokri F
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 15016018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative SEM study on the effect of root conditioning with EDTA or tetracycline Hcl on periodontally involved root surfaces.
    Babay N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2000; 11(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 11307429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro evaluation of the root surface microtopography following the use of two polishing systems by Confocal Microscopy (CFM) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM).
    Solís Moreno C; Sanz-Moliner JD; Pascual La Rocca A; Nart J; Santos Alemany A
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Dec; 12(4):243-7. PubMed ID: 24390023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study.
    Fox SC; Moriarty JD; Kusy RP
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):485-90. PubMed ID: 2202807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.