These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26306549)

  • 1. Planning for ex situ conservation in the face of uncertainty.
    Canessa S; Converse SJ; West M; Clemann N; Gillespie G; McFadden M; Silla AJ; Parris KM; McCarthy MA
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):599-609. PubMed ID: 26306549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects.
    Tulloch AI; Maloney RF; Joseph LN; Bennett JR; Di Fonzo MM; Probert WJ; O'Connor SM; Densem JP; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):513-24. PubMed ID: 25327837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effective conservation of an endangered frog under uncertainty.
    Rose LE; Heard GW; Chee YE; Wintle BA
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):350-61. PubMed ID: 26395969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining when to change course in management actions.
    Ng CF; McCarthy MA; Martin TG; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1617-25. PubMed ID: 25155429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structuring decisions for managing threatened and endangered species in a changing climate.
    Gregory R; Arvai J; Gerber LR
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1212-21. PubMed ID: 24299087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developments in amphibian captive breeding and reintroduction programs.
    Harding G; Griffiths RA; Pavajeau L
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):340-9. PubMed ID: 26306460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A decision framework for prioritizing multiple management actions for threatened marine megafauna.
    Fuentes MM; Blackwood J; Jones B; Kim M; Leis B; Limpus CJ; Marsh H; Mitchell J; Pouzols FM; Pressey RL; Visconti P
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Jan; 25(1):200-14. PubMed ID: 26255368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the global zoo response to the amphibian crisis through 20-year trends in captive collections.
    Dawson J; Patel F; Griffiths RA; Young RP
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 26219401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapidly assessing cobenefits to advance threat-management alliances.
    Rees MW; Carwardine J; Reeson A; Firn J
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Aug; 34(4):843-853. PubMed ID: 32406533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applying the zoo model to conservation of threatened exceptional plant species.
    Wood J; Ballou JD; Callicrate T; Fant JB; Griffith MP; Kramer AT; Lacy RC; Meyer A; Sullivan S; Traylor-Holzer K; Walsh SK; Havens K
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Dec; 34(6):1416-1425. PubMed ID: 32233087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The dilemma of pest suppression in the conservation of endangered species.
    Adler PH; Barzen J; Gray E; Lacy A; Urbanek RP; Converse SJ
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Aug; 33(4):788-796. PubMed ID: 30520153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ex situ management as insurance against extinction of mammalian megafauna in an uncertain world.
    Farhadinia MS; Johnson PJ; Zimmermann A; McGowan PJK; Meijaard E; Stanley-Price M; Macdonald DW
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Aug; 34(4):988-996. PubMed ID: 32144814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review of threatened Malagasy freshwater fishes in zoos and aquaria: The necessity of an ex situ conservation network-A call for action.
    Leiss L; Rauhaus A; Rakotoarison A; Fusari C; Vences M; Ziegler T
    Zoo Biol; 2022 May; 41(3):244-262. PubMed ID: 34870879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guiding the prioritization of the most endangered and evolutionary distinct birds for new zoo conservation programs.
    Biega AM; Lamont M; Mooers A; Bowkett AE; Martin TE
    Zoo Biol; 2019 May; 38(3):305-315. PubMed ID: 30868683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choosing optimal trigger points for ex situ, in toto conservation of single population threatened species.
    Brown K; Tambyah T; Fenwick J; Grant P; Bode M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0266244. PubMed ID: 35390021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Keeping All the PIECES: Phylogenetically Informed Ex Situ Conservation of Endangered Species.
    Larkin DJ; Jacobi SK; Hipp AL; Kramer AT
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156973. PubMed ID: 27257671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A strategy for monitoring and managing declines in an amphibian community.
    Grant EH; Zipkin EF; Nichols JD; Campbell JP
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1245-53. PubMed ID: 24001175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel holistic framework for genetic-based captive-breeding and reintroduction programs.
    Attard CR; Möller LM; Sasaki M; Hammer MP; Bice CM; Brauer CJ; Carvalho DC; Harris JO; Beheregaray LB
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1060-9. PubMed ID: 26892747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Informed actions: where to cost effectively manage multiple threats to species to maximize return on investment.
    Auerbach NA; Tulloch AIT; Possingham HP
    Ecol Appl; 2014; 24(6):1357-73. PubMed ID: 29160659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accounting for complementarity to maximize monitoring power for species management.
    Tulloch AI; Chadès I; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Oct; 27(5):988-99. PubMed ID: 24073812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.