These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26307478)

  • 61. [The rank estimate of indicators of obstetric-gynecologic service activity as a foundation of enhancing of medical care quality].
    Probl Sotsialnoi Gig Zdravookhranenniiai Istor Med; 2011; (1):35-8. PubMed ID: 21506316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Caesarean section controversy. Further research is needed on why rates of caesarean section are increasing.
    O'Connell MP; Lindow W
    BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7241):1074. PubMed ID: 10836807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Monitoring, risk adjustment and strategies to decrease cesarean rates.
    Gregory KD
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Dec; 12(6):481-6. PubMed ID: 11128409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. What are the key components of quality perinatal and pediatric end-of-life care? A literature review.
    Widger KA; Wilkins K
    J Palliat Care; 2004; 20(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 15332475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Identification and collection of quality indicators for perinatal care.
    Suresh GK; Ferguson LA; Tomlinson M; Campbell BB; Ohlinger J; Prochnicki B; Nicholas S; Warren MB; Edwards W; Chute L; Christian L; Hagen E; Sieber D; Schriefer J
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2007; 22(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 17149089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Have caesarean section rates become an obsolete statistic? Time to throw in the towel in the fight to reduce caesarean section rates.
    Oláh K
    BJOG; 2019 Jun; 126(7):828-830. PubMed ID: 30739393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Perinatal quality indicators: yardsticks for quality of care, measures of population health.
    Kirby RS
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Nov; 171(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24128923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Learning the Hard Way: Lessons on Gender and Power.
    Diaz-Tello F
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2017; 7(3):200-202. PubMed ID: 29249709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. [Results of an analysis of perinatal care in the Czech Republic in 1994 and future tasks].
    Stembera Z
    Ceska Gynekol; 1995 Dec; 60(6):307-8. PubMed ID: 8599713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. [Quality assurance and Cesarean section. Comments on the WHO recommendations].
    Endler M; Hauke E; Gruber W
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1992; 32 Suppl 1():62-3. PubMed ID: 1286345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Building a European perinatal health information system: plurality, innovation and realism.
    Zeitlin J; Mohangoo A; Macfarlane A; Cuttini M; Delnord M; Gissler M; Blondel B; Alexander S; Barros H;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Nov; 171(1):193-4. PubMed ID: 24007622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Caesarean section rates.
    Chamberlain G
    Lancet; 1991 Jul; 338(8759):125-6. PubMed ID: 1676458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. What is happening to caesarean section rates?
    Kabra SG; Narayanan R; Chaturvedi M; Anand P; Mathur G
    Lancet; 1994 Jan; 343(8890):179-80. PubMed ID: 7904030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Sequelae of caesarean section.
    DUNN HP
    N Z Med J; 1960 Apr; 59():180-3. PubMed ID: 13818680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Caesarean section.
    GIBSON GB
    Ir J Med Sci; 1962 Jan; 433():27-32. PubMed ID: 13898408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Caesarean section rates, Australia 1986: variations at state and small area level.
    Sonneveld SW; Correy JF
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 May; 32(2):178-9. PubMed ID: 1520210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. British caesarean section rates have we reached a plateau?
    Savage W; Francome C
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Jul; 101(7):645. PubMed ID: 8043549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Caesarean section rates in England and Wales.
    Bradley S; Robinson S; Golden J
    Lancet; 1980 May; 1(8179):1195. PubMed ID: 6104017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. How can we achieve consensual indicators to be better accepted and more widely used?
    Santos JV; Correia C; Cabral F; Bernardes J; Freitas A; Costa-Pereira A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Feb; 173():123-4; discussion 124. PubMed ID: 24331113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Caesarean section.
    SALZMANN KD
    Lancet; 1957 May; 272(6978):1093. PubMed ID: 13429893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.