These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26307478)

  • 81. Rate of caesarean section is alarming in China.
    Mi J; Liu F
    Lancet; 2014 Apr; 383(9927):1463-1464. PubMed ID: 24766963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Care Quality Commission reveals names of people involved in alleged cover-up decision.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2013 Jun; 346():f4052. PubMed ID: 23794159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Hyperglycaemia in pregnancy: what's in a name?
    Murphy HR; Hadden DR
    Diabet Med; 2014 Mar; 31(3):252-3. PubMed ID: 24236661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Assessing effective care in normal labor: the Bologna score.
    Chalmers B; Porter R
    Birth; 2001 Jun; 28(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 11380378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates.
    Betran AP; Torloni MR; Zhang JJ; Gülmezoglu AM;
    BJOG; 2016 Apr; 123(5):667-70. PubMed ID: 26681211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. A report from #BlueJC: Does caesarean section increase the risks of childhood cancer?
    Leung EY
    BJOG; 2014 Oct; 121(11):1451. PubMed ID: 25250939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Caesarean section: Points raised in responses.
    Davies S
    BMJ; 2007 Dec; 335(7632):1226. PubMed ID: 18079524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Re: Wide differences in mode of delivery between countries in Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study: Caesarean section rates are the WRONG target.
    Quinn MJ
    BJOG; 2016 Dec; 123(13):2230-2231. PubMed ID: 27891811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. The partograph in daily practice: it's quality that matters.
    Bosse G; Massawe S; Jahn A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Jun; 77(3):243-4. PubMed ID: 12065136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Perinatal care in a patient with diagnosed Westphal's disease.
    Szyszkowski M; Pruski D; Banach P; Przybylski M
    Ginekol Pol; 2019; 90(3):177. PubMed ID: 30950009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. [The P.M.S.I. Enlargement: Evaluation System of Perinatal Care Networks in Bourgogne, France].
    Sagot P; Gouyon-Cornet B; Gouyon JB
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 Feb; 31(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 12718997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Cardiac surgery report cards: making the grade.
    Grunkemeier GL; Zerr KJ; Jin R
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 Dec; 72(6):1845-8. PubMed ID: 11789758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Re: Using Robson's Ten-Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro-Peristat study.
    Emms A; Odendaal J; Quenby S
    BJOG; 2021 Aug; 128(9):1558-1559. PubMed ID: 34062041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. [Re: How do we compare quality of health care?].
    Kristoffersen DT
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2015 Sep; 135(16):1427. PubMed ID: 26356431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. [Re: How do we compare quality of health care?].
    Wyller TB
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2015 Sep; 135(16):1427. PubMed ID: 26356430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. [Re: How do we compare quality of health care?].
    Daae C; Nordmo AS; Myhre JI
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2015 Sep; 135(16):1426-7. PubMed ID: 26356429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Investigating Caesarean Section Practice among Teenage Romanian Mothers Using Modified Robson Ten Group Classification System.
    Matei A; Dimitriu MC; Roșu GA; Furău CG; Ionescu CA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(20):. PubMed ID: 34682473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Re: How useful are national caesarean section rates for monitoring quality of perinatal care?Other factors affecting variation in caesarean section rates in other countries.
    Lee HH; Kim TH; Kim JM
    BJOG; 2015 Sep; 122(10):1422. PubMed ID: 26307478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Rate of caesarean section as a process indicator of safe-motherhood programmes: the case of Kenya.
    Gichangi P; Apers L; Temmerman M
    J Health Popul Nutr; 2001 Jun; 19(2):52-8. PubMed ID: 11503347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate.
    Robson M; Hartigan L; Murphy M
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 23127896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.