These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26308015)

  • 1. A Web-Based Respondent Driven Sampling Pilot Targeting Young People at Risk for Chlamydia Trachomatis in Social and Sexual Networks with Testing: A Use Evaluation.
    Theunissen K; Hoebe C; Kok G; Crutzen R; Kara-Zaïtri C; de Vries N; van Bergen J; Hamilton R; van der Sande M; Dukers-Muijrers N
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Aug; 12(8):9889-906. PubMed ID: 26308015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using intervention mapping for the development of a targeted secure web-based outreach strategy named SafeFriend, for Chlamydia trachomatis testing in young people at risk.
    Theunissen KA; Hoebe CJ; Crutzen R; Kara-Zaïtri C; de Vries NK; van Bergen JE; van der Sande MA; Dukers-Muijrers NH
    BMC Public Health; 2013 Oct; 13():996. PubMed ID: 24148656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chlamydia trachomatis testing among young people: what is the role of stigma?
    Theunissen KA; Bos AE; Hoebe CJ; Kok G; Vluggen S; Crutzen R; Dukers-Muijrers NH
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Jul; 15():651. PubMed ID: 26169173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acceptance of Home-Based Chlamydia Genital and Anorectal Testing Using Short Message Service (SMS) in Previously Tested Young People and Their Social and Sexual Networks.
    Dukers-Muijrers NH; Theunissen KA; Wolffs PT; Kok G; Hoebe CJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133575. PubMed ID: 26230085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chlamyweb Study II: a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of an online offer of home-based
    Kersaudy-Rahib D; Lydié N; Leroy C; March L; Bébéar C; Arwidson P; de Barbeyrac B
    Sex Transm Infect; 2017 May; 93(3):188-195. PubMed ID: 28377422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chlamyweb Study I: rationale, design and acceptability of an internet-based chlamydia testing intervention.
    Lydié N; de Barbeyrac B; Bluzat L; Le Roy C; Kersaudy-Rahib D
    Sex Transm Infect; 2017 May; 93(3):179-187. PubMed ID: 28258251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who participates in the Dutch Chlamydia screening? A study on demographic and behavioral correlates of participation and positivity.
    Op de Coul EL; Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Fennema JS; Hoebe CJ; Koekenbier RH; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; van der Sande MA; van den Broek IV
    Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Feb; 39(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 22249297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retesting for genital Chlamydia trachomatis among visitors of a sexually transmitted infections clinic: randomized intervention trial of home- versus clinic-based recall.
    Götz HM; Wolfers ME; Luijendijk A; van den Broek IV
    BMC Infect Dis; 2013 May; 13():239. PubMed ID: 23705624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The added value of chlamydia screening between 2008-2010 in reaching young people in addition to chlamydia testing in regular care; an observational study.
    van Liere GA; Dukers-Muijrers NH; van Bergen JE; Götz HM; Stals F; Hoebe CJ
    BMC Infect Dis; 2014 Nov; 14():612. PubMed ID: 25403312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual partner characteristics and incident rectal
    Ramadhani HO; Liu H; Nowak RG; Crowell TA; Ndomb T; Gaydos C; Peel S; Ndembi N; Baral SD; Ake J; Charurat ME;
    Sex Transm Infect; 2017 Aug; 93(5):348-355. PubMed ID: 28235839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infection among users of an internet-based testing service in Sweden.
    Novak M; Novak D
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2013 Mar; 4(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 23427929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of Chlamydia trachomatis infection to facilitate selective screening on population and individual level: a cross-sectional study of a population-based screening programme.
    van Klaveren D; Götz HM; Op de Coul EL; Steyerberg EW; Vergouwe Y
    Sex Transm Infect; 2016 Sep; 92(6):433-40. PubMed ID: 26843401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Partner notification for chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infections: eight years of patient referral experience in the major Portuguese sexually transmitted infections clinic, 2000-07.
    Santo I; Azevedo J; Nunes B; Gomes JP; Borrego MJ
    Int J STD AIDS; 2011 Oct; 22(10):548-51. PubMed ID: 21998173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The acceptability and cost of a home-based chlamydia retesting strategy: findings from the REACT randomised controlled trial.
    Smith KS; Kaldor JM; Hocking JS; Jamil MS; McNulty AM; Read P; Bradshaw CS; Chen MY; Fairley CK; Wand H; Worthington K; Blake S; Knight V; Rawlinson W; Saville M; Tabrizi SN; Garland SM; Donovan B; Guy R
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Jan; 16():83. PubMed ID: 26822715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who tests whom? A comprehensive overview of Chlamydia trachomatis test practices in a Dutch region among different STI care providers for urogenital, anorectal and oropharyngeal sites in young people: a cross-sectional study.
    den Heijer CD; van Liere GA; Hoebe CJ; van Bergen JE; Cals JW; Stals FS; Dukers-Muijrers NH
    Sex Transm Infect; 2016 May; 92(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 26265066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of a mass media campaign to recruit young adults for testing of Chlamydia trachomatis by use of home obtained and mailed samples.
    Andersen B; Østergaard L; Møller JK; Olesen F
    Sex Transm Infect; 2001 Dec; 77(6):416-8. PubMed ID: 11714938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Community-Based Assessment to Inform a Chlamydia Screening Program for Women in a Rural American Indian Community.
    Smartlowit-Briggs L; Pearson C; Whitefoot P; Altamirano BN; Womack M; Bastin M; Dombrowski JC
    Sex Transm Dis; 2016 Jun; 43(6):390-5. PubMed ID: 27196261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: estimating cost-effectiveness using dynamic modeling and Dutch data.
    de Vries R; van Bergen JE; de Jong-van den Berg LT; Postma MJ;
    Value Health; 2006; 9(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16441519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Not again! Effect of previous test results, age group and reason for testing on (re-)infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in Germany.
    Lang AS; An der Heiden M; Jansen K; Sailer A; Bremer V; Dudareva S;
    BMC Infect Dis; 2018 Aug; 18(1):424. PubMed ID: 30144825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.