270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26308199)
1. Midurethral slings: which should I choose and what is the evidence for use?
Kirby AC; Tan-Kim J; Nager CW
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 27(5):359-65. PubMed ID: 26308199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of late complications of retropubic and transobturator slings in stress urinary incontinence.
Petri E; Ashok K
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Mar; 23(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 21845508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cystourethroscopy following midurethral slings: is it always necessary?
Melon J; Kelly EC; van Delft KWM
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):789-793. PubMed ID: 29564509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical effectiveness of retropubic (IVS-02) and transobturator (IVS-04) midurethral slings: randomized trial.
Rechberger T; Futyma K; Jankiewicz K; Adamiak A; Skorupski P
Eur Urol; 2009 Jul; 56(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19285788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Serious complications and recurrences after retropubic vs transobturator midurethral sling procedures for 2682 patients in the VIGI-MESH register.
Armengaud C; Fauconnier A; Drioueche H; Campagne Loiseau S; De Tayrac R; Saussine C; Panel L; Cosson M; Deffieux X; Lucot JP; Pizzoferrato AC; Ferry P; Vidart A; Thubert T; Capon G; Debodinance P; Gauthier T; Koebele A; Salet-Lizee D; Hermieu JF; Game X; Ramanah R; Lamblin G; Lecornet E; Carlier-Guérin C; Chartier-Kastler E; Fritel X
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 230(4):428.e1-428.e13. PubMed ID: 38008151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reoperation for Urinary Incontinence After Retropubic and Transobturator Sling Procedures.
Trabuco EC; Carranza D; El Nashar SA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Elliott DS; Linder BJ; Occhino J; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):333-342. PubMed ID: 31306327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical Pain After Transobturator and Retropubic Midurethral Sling Placement.
Thomas TN; Siff LN; Jelovsek JE; Barber M
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 130(1):118-125. PubMed ID: 28594776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral synthetic slings: does one sling fit all?
McAchran SE
Curr Urol Rep; 2010 Sep; 11(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 20625859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence: a urogynecology perspective.
Ridgeway B; Barber MD
Urol Clin North Am; 2012 Aug; 39(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 22877711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of midurethral slings in intrinsic sphincteric-related stress urinary incontinence.
Lim YN; Dwyer PL
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 21(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 19593133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between the retropubic and transobturator approaches in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications.
Sun X; Yang Q; Sun F; Shi Q
Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 26005962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changing trends in surgery for stress urinary incontinence.
Geller EJ; Wu JM
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 25(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 23872710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The prospective comparison of the clinical effectiveness and the complication rate of retropubic (IVS-02) and transobturator (IVS-04) midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence].
Rechberger T; Adamiak A; Jankiewicz K; Skorupski P; Wróbel A; Tomaszewski J; Futyma K
Ginekol Pol; 2007 Apr; 78(4):299-302. PubMed ID: 17621992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reoperation for urinary incontinence: a nationwide cohort study, 1998-2007.
Foss Hansen M; Lose G; Kesmodel US; Gradel KO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):263.e1-263.e8. PubMed ID: 26344752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stress Urinary Incontinence: Slings, Single-Incision Slings, and Nonmesh Approaches.
Caldwell L; White AB
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2021 Sep; 48(3):449-466. PubMed ID: 34416931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.
Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; de Ridder DJ; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 25168619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are patients willing to trade cure rate against less pain? Patients' preferences for single incision midurethral sling or transobturator standard midurethral sling.
Schellart RP; Casteleijn FM; Dijkgraaf MGW; Tutolo M; Roovers JWR
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Apr; 36(4):1187-1193. PubMed ID: 27564322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.
Novara G; Artibani W; Barber MD; Chapple CR; Costantini E; Ficarra V; Hilton P; Nilsson CG; Waltregny D
Eur Urol; 2010 Aug; 58(2):218-38. PubMed ID: 20434257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Removal of transobturator midurethral sling for refractory thigh pain.
Wolter CE; Starkman JS; Scarpero HM; Dmochowski RR
Urology; 2008 Aug; 72(2):461.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18314169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence--midurethral slings: top-down, bottom-up, "outside-in," or "inside-out".
Silva WA
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 50(2):362-75. PubMed ID: 17513924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
