324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26308410)
1. Peer Review in Transplantation.
Hutchinson JA
Transplantation; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1746-8. PubMed ID: 26308410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How to review a paper for Heart.
Otto CM
Heart; 2015 Jan; 101(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25502328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. What happens to your submission at Australasian Journal on Ageing?
Parkinson L; Sims J
Australas J Ageing; 2017 Jun; 36(2):87-88. PubMed ID: 28635096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Independence Day.
Heinemann MK
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Mar; 65(2):73. PubMed ID: 28282657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. So you want to publish your research in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis?
Greaves M
J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Mar; 15(3):405-410. PubMed ID: 27966273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fortifying the external peer review: an editorial perspective.
Sohail S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Jan; 25(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 25604359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
Newton DP
Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.
Elmore SA
Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Dec; 45(8):1028-1031. PubMed ID: 29145784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Message from the editor-in-chief.
Chapman JR
Transplantation; 2015 Jan; 99(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 25525913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Your role and responsibilities in the manuscript peer review process.
Brazeau GA; Dipiro JT; Fincham JE; Boucher BA; Tracy TS
Am J Pharm Educ; 2008 Jun; 72(3):69. PubMed ID: 18698392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
Werkö L
Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Editorial: peer reviewers make it all possible at Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®.
Leopold SS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3693-4. PubMed ID: 26463568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Useful reviews.
Parkinson L
Australas J Ageing; 2018 Jun; 37(2):87. PubMed ID: 29870147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New guidelines for authors.
Westhoff C; Bowen T
Contraception; 2013 Jul; 88(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23773526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Financial disclosure of reviewers.
Parameswaran K
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2003 Oct; 168(8):1010; author reply 1010. PubMed ID: 14555459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A thank you note from the editor-in-chief.
Farrell GC
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Jan; 27(1):10. PubMed ID: 22188026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Preface: Scientific Premise and Rigors in Scientific Research, Peer Review, Editing and Publishing.
Zhang R
Curr Cancer Drug Targets; 2017; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 28067174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
