These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2630900)
1. On research on HIV infection and AIDS in correctional institutions. Dubler NN; Sidel VW Milbank Q; 1989; 67(2):171-207. PubMed ID: 2630900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. U.S. prisoners' access to experimental HIV therapies. Collins A; Baumgartner D; Henry K Minn Med; 1995 Nov; 78(11):45-8. PubMed ID: 8531905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The changing clinical trials scene: the role of the IRB. Mitchell SC; Steingrub J IRB; 1988; 10(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. IRB/FDA requirements relevant to HIV/AIDS clinical trials in correctional settings. Cohen J; AIDS Read; 2001 Jan; 11(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 11215087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A qualitative exploration of HIV/AIDS health care services in Indian prisons. Guin S J Correct Health Care; 2009 Jul; 15(3):179-89. PubMed ID: 19477802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy. Moore DL Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):559-81. PubMed ID: 11652854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Considering experimentation and elusive truth: informed consent made difficult. Brodeur D Issues (St Louis Mo); 1992; 7(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns. Kobasic DM J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Federal commissions and local IRBs. Yesley MS Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):11-2. PubMed ID: 6643032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy. Society; 1975; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A review of the legal and ethical issues for the conduct of HIV-related research in prisons. Lazzarini Z; Altice FL AIDS Public Policy J; 2000; 15(3-4):105-35. PubMed ID: 12189712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies. Prentice ED; Gordon B IRB; 1997; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. HIV clinical trials in correctional settings: right or retrogression? De Groot AS; Bick J; Thomas D; Stubblefield E AIDS Read; 2001 Jan; 11(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 11215086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. HIV-infected prisoners: what mental health services are constitutionally mandated? Mayer C J Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(4):517-53. PubMed ID: 12199277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners. Herch F; Flower R Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Guidelines for confidentiality in research on AIDS. Bayer R; Levine C; Murray TH IRB; 1984; 6(6):1-7. PubMed ID: 11649192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]