7344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26309185)
21. Prospective study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with palpably negative neck.
Ng SH; Yen TC; Chang JT; Chan SC; Ko SF; Wang HM; Lee LY; Kang CJ; Wong AM; Liao CT
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Sep; 24(27):4371-6. PubMed ID: 16983105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative Performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in Detection and Characterization of Pulmonary Lesions in 121 Oncologic Patients.
Sawicki LM; Grueneisen J; Buchbender C; Schaarschmidt BM; Gomez B; Ruhlmann V; Wetter A; Umutlu L; Antoch G; Heusch P
J Nucl Med; 2016 Apr; 57(4):582-6. PubMed ID: 26742715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Detection of occult primary tumors in patients with cervical metastases of unknown primary tumors: comparison of (18)F FDG PET/CT with contrast-enhanced CT or CT/MR imaging-prospective study.
Lee JR; Kim JS; Roh JL; Lee JH; Baek JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 25405771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. 18F-FDG-PET/MR increases diagnostic confidence in detection of bone metastases compared with 18F-FDG-PET/CT.
Samarin A; Hüllner M; Queiroz MA; Stolzmann P; Burger IA; von Schulthess G; Veit-Haibach P
Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Dec; 36(12):1165-73. PubMed ID: 26397999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. MR-based attenuation correction for cardiac FDG PET on a hybrid PET/MRI scanner: comparison with standard CT attenuation correction.
Vontobel J; Liga R; Possner M; Clerc OF; Mikulicic F; Veit-Haibach P; Ter Voert EE; Fuchs TA; Stehli J; Pazhenkottil AP; Benz DC; Gräni C; Gaemperli O; Herzog B; Buechel RR; Kaufmann PA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Sep; 42(10):1574-80. PubMed ID: 26091704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Integrated whole-body PET/MR hybrid imaging: clinical experience.
Quick HH; von Gall C; Zeilinger M; Wiesmüller M; Braun H; Ziegler S; Kuwert T; Uder M; Dörfler A; Kalender WA; Lell M
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):280-9. PubMed ID: 23442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Is combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography superior to positron emission tomography or computed tomography alone for diagnosis, staging and restaging of pancreatic lesions?
Casneuf V; Delrue L; Kelles A; Van Damme N; Van Huysse J; Berrevoet F; De Vos M; Duyck P; Peeters M
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2007; 70(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 18330088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. PET/MRI with diagnostic MR sequences vs PET/CT in the detection of abdominal and pelvic cancer.
Xin J; Ma Q; Guo Q; Sun H; Zhang S; Liu C; Zhai W
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 26971419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hybrid imaging for detection of carcinoma of unknown primary: A preliminary comparison trial of whole-body PET/MRI versus PET/CT.
Ruhlmann V; Ruhlmann M; Bellendorf A; Grueneisen J; Sawicki LM; Grafe H; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Umutlu L
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):1941-1947. PubMed ID: 27776644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CT in whole-body staging of recurrent breast cancer.
Sawicki LM; Grueneisen J; Schaarschmidt BM; Buchbender C; Nagarajah J; Umutlu L; Antoch G; Kinner S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Feb; 85(2):459-65. PubMed ID: 26781152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Does 18F-FDG PET/MRI reduce the number of indeterminate abdominal incidentalomas compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT?
Schaarschmidt BM; Grueneisen J; Heusch P; Gomez B; Umutlu L; Ruhlmann V; Rosenbaum-Krumme S; Antoch G; Buchbender C
Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Jun; 36(6):588-95. PubMed ID: 25759944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of the Outcome of Lung Nodules Missed on 18F-FDG PET/MRI Compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Known Malignancies.
Sawicki LM; Grueneisen J; Buchbender C; Schaarschmidt BM; Gomez B; Ruhlmann V; Umutlu L; Antoch G; Heusch P
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 26514173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.
Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET/CT versus whole-body MRI for detection of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis type 1.
Derlin T; Tornquist K; Münster S; Apostolova I; Hagel C; Friedrich RE; Wedegärtner U; Mautner VF
Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Jan; 38(1):e19-25. PubMed ID: 23242059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography: computed tomography in recurrent and metastatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Jadvar H; Henderson RW; Conti PS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 17414758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Standardized Uptake Values in Normal Structures Between PET/CT and PET/MRI in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
Lyons K; Seghers V; Sorensen JI; Zhang W; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1094-101. PubMed ID: 26496558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of hybrid FDG PET/MRI compared with PET/CT in colorectal cancer staging and restaging: a pilot study.
Paspulati RM; Partovi S; Herrmann KA; Krishnamurthi S; Delaney CP; Nguyen NC
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Aug; 40(6):1415-25. PubMed ID: 26112492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Standardized uptake values for [¹⁸F] FDG in normal organ tissues: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Heusch P; Buchbender C; Beiderwellen K; Nensa F; Hartung-Knemeyer V; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):870-6. PubMed ID: 23394765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Qualitative FDG PET Image Assessment Using Automated Three-Segment MR Attenuation Correction Versus CT Attenuation Correction in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
Lyons K; Seghers V; Williams JL; Sorensen JI; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):652-8. PubMed ID: 26295654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 99 m-Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy and 18 F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of skeletal metastases.
Chang CY; Gill CM; Joseph Simeone F; Taneja AK; Huang AJ; Torriani M; Bredella MA
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 25533313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
