These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26311175)

  • 1. The Influence of Biomedical Information and Childhood History on Sentencing.
    Kim J; Boytos A; Seong Y; Park K
    Behav Sci Law; 2015; 33(6):815-26. PubMed ID: 26311175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of the Psychopathy Checklist--Revised in capital cases: mock jurors' responses to the label of psychopathy.
    Cox J; DeMatteo DS; Foster EE
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):878-91. PubMed ID: 20824653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Juror Decision-making in Death Penalty Sentencing when Presented with Defendant's History of Child Abuse or Neglect.
    Bell Holleran LL; Vaughan TJ; Vandiver DM
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Nov; 34(6):742-766. PubMed ID: 28098410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nature, nurture, and capital punishment: How evidence of a genetic-environment interaction, future dangerousness, and deliberation affect sentencing decisions.
    Gordon N; Greene E
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Jan; 36(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 28881042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of criminal defendant's history of childhood sexual abuse and personality disorder diagnosis on juror decision making.
    Butler E; Jacquin K
    Personal Ment Health; 2014 Aug; 8(3):188-98. PubMed ID: 24753498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of behavioral genetic evidence on the adjudication of criminal behavior.
    Appelbaum PS; Scurich N
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 24618524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No sympathy for the devil: attributing psychopathic traits to capital murderers also predicts support for executing them.
    Edens JF; Davis KM; Fernandez Smith K; Guy LS
    Personal Disord; 2013 Apr; 4(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 22452773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Proposed Model for Assessing Defendant Competence to Self-Represent.
    White MM; Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):425-436. PubMed ID: 28003386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Issues pertaining to expert evidence and the reasoning about punishment in a neuroscience-based sentencing appeal.
    McCay A; Ryan CJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 65():101409. PubMed ID: 30591221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision.
    Antonio ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 16557640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
    Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reconciling the opposing effects of neurobiological evidence on criminal sentencing judgments.
    Allen CH; Vold K; Felsen G; Blumenthal-Barby JS; Aharoni E
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210584. PubMed ID: 30657761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural circuits in the brain that are activated when mitigating criminal sentences.
    Yamada M; Camerer CF; Fujie S; Kato M; Matsuda T; Takano H; Ito H; Suhara T; Takahashi H
    Nat Commun; 2012 Mar; 3():759. PubMed ID: 22453832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Mental Health and Neuroscience Evidence on Juror Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant: the Moderating Role of Political Orientation.
    Mowle EN; Edens JF; Clark JW; Sörman K
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Nov; 34(6):726-741. PubMed ID: 27620269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of a defendant's childhood physical abuse on lay support for sentencing: The moderating role of essentialism.
    Xie SS; Berryessa CM
    Behav Sci Law; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38977839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death?
    Edens JF; Colwell LH; Desforges DM; Fernandez K
    Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(5):603-25. PubMed ID: 16170787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The psychopathic "label" and effects on punishment outcomes: A meta-analysis.
    Berryessa CM; Wohlstetter B
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Feb; 43(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 30570278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining criminal responsibility: How relevant are insight and personal attitudes to mock jurors?
    Jung S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():37-42. PubMed ID: 26294081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
    Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.