These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2631171)

  • 1. [Method for calculating the distribution of randomly expected scores in a false-true-do not know-type of test].
    Pérez-Padilla JR; Viniegra Velázquez L
    Rev Invest Clin; 1989; 41(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 2631171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating the potential influence of established multiple-choice test-taking cues on item response in a pharmacotherapy board certification examination preparatory manual: a pilot study.
    Gettig JP
    Pharmacotherapy; 2006 Apr; 26(4):558-62. PubMed ID: 16553516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correcting for guessing increases validity in multiple-choice examinations in an oral and maxillofacial pathology course.
    Prihoda TJ; Pinckard RN; McMahan CA; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Apr; 70(4):378-86. PubMed ID: 16595530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A reappraisal of the use of multiple choice questions.
    Premadasa IG
    Med Teach; 1993; 15(2-3):237-42. PubMed ID: 8246720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective implementation of correction for guessing in oral and maxillofacial pathology multiple-choice examinations: did student performance improve?
    Prihoda TJ; Pinckard RN; McMahan CA; Littlefield JH; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1149-59. PubMed ID: 18923095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between Long-Menu and Open-Ended Questions in computerized medical assessments. A randomized controlled trial.
    Rotthoff T; Baehring T; Dicken HD; Fahron U; Richter B; Fischer MR; Scherbaum WA
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Oct; 6():50. PubMed ID: 17032439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonrestricted multiple-choice examination items.
    Kolstad R; Goaz P; Kolstad R
    J Dent Educ; 1982 Aug; 46(8):485-8. PubMed ID: 6954178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of medical knowledge: the pros and cons of using true/false multiple choice questions.
    Chandratilake M; Davis M; Ponnamperuma G
    Natl Med J India; 2011; 24(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 22208143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Student interaction characteristics during collaborative group testing.
    Giuliodori MJ; Lujan HL; DiCarlo SE
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19261757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mapping multiple dimensions of student learning: the ConstructMap program.
    Kennedy CA; Draney K
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19299881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of a 'don't know' option on test scores: number-right and formula scoring compared.
    Muijtjens AM; Mameren HV; Hoogenboom RJ; Evers JL; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 1999 Apr; 33(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 10336757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The expert consensus guideline series. Optimizing pharmacologic treatment of psychotic disorders. Introduction: methods, commentary, and summary.
    Kane JM; Leucht S; Carpenter D; Docherty JP;
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2003; 64 Suppl 12():5-19. PubMed ID: 14640142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microcomputer as patient educator.
    Beck RJ; Ellis LB; Scott DM; Raines JR; Hakanson N
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1982 Dec; 39(12):2105-8. PubMed ID: 7180860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Answering multiple-choice questions in high-stakes medical examinations.
    Fischer MR; Herrmann S; Kopp V
    Med Educ; 2005 Sep; 39(9):890-4. PubMed ID: 16150028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.
    Bosworth B; Burtless G; Steuerle E
    Soc Secur Bull; 2000; 63(4):74-98. PubMed ID: 11641991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Counterfactual thinking and the first instinct fallacy.
    Kruger J; Wirtz D; Miller DT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 May; 88(5):725-35. PubMed ID: 15898871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using verification feedback to correct errors made on a multiple-choice test.
    Marsh EJ; Lozito JP; Umanath S; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    Memory; 2012; 20(6):645-53. PubMed ID: 22640417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Knierim A; Hayes SK; Ware J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Dec; 26(8):662-71. PubMed ID: 17014932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized controlled trial comparing instructions regarding unsafe response options in a MCQ examination.
    Tweed M; Wilkinson T
    Med Teach; 2009 Jan; 31(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 18825569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of an educational initiative on applied knowledge and attitudes of physicians who treat sexual dysfunction.
    Shabsigh R; Sadovsky R; Rosen RC; Carson CC; Seftel AD; Noursalehi M
    Int J Impot Res; 2009; 21(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 19092935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.