185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26313308)
1. Radiation exposure to foetus and breasts from dental X-ray examinations: effect of lead shields.
Kelaranta A; Ekholm M; Toroi P; Kortesniemi M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(1):20150095. PubMed ID: 26313308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT.
Wrzesień M; Olszewski J
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 30(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 28584324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ESTIMATING RADIATION DOSE TO MAJOR ORGANS IN DENTAL X-RAY EXAMINATIONS: A PHANTOM STUDY.
Li Y; Huang B; Cao J; Fang T; Liu G; Li X; Wu J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Dec; 192(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 33320946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient shielding during dentomaxillofacial radiography: Recommendations from the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.
Benavides E; Bhula A; Gohel A; Lurie AG; Mallya SM; Ramesh A; Tyndall DA
J Am Dent Assoc; 2023 Sep; 154(9):826-835.e2. PubMed ID: 37530694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of a Commercial Lead Apron on Patient Skin Dose Delivered During Oral and Maxillofacial Examinations under Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
Schulze RKW; Sazgar M; Karle H; de Las Heras Gala H
Health Phys; 2017 Aug; 113(2):129-134. PubMed ID: 28658058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of thyroid gland shielding in dental CBCT using a paediatric anthropomorphic phantom.
Hidalgo A; Davies J; Horner K; Theodorakou C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(3):20140285. PubMed ID: 25411710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skin entrance dose with and without lead apron in digital panoramic radiography for selected sensitive body regions.
Schulze RKW; Cremers C; Karle H; de Las Heras Gala H
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1327-1333. PubMed ID: 27324474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effective doses from panoramic radiography and CBCT (cone beam CT) using dose area product (DAP) in dentistry.
Shin HS; Nam KC; Park H; Choi HU; Kim HY; Park CS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(5):20130439. PubMed ID: 24845340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography.
Al-Okshi A; Nilsson M; Petersson A; Wiese M; Lindh C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120343. PubMed ID: 23610090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation.
Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Bumann A; Visser H; Hirsch E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18456133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Occupational and patients effective radiation doses in dental imaging.
Tamam N; Almuqrin AH; Mansour S; Elnour A; Musa M; Omer H; Sulieman A; Bradley DA
Appl Radiat Isot; 2021 Nov; 177():109899. PubMed ID: 34438276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Radiologic exposure of the dental patient: comparison of the doses delivered by different techniques].
Jones P; Reychler H; Engels H; Wambersie A
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2007; 62(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 18506961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination.
Welborn D; Lockwood P
Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):360-365. PubMed ID: 35000868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Female breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose.
Yilmaz MH; Albayram S; Yaşar D; Ozer H; Adaletli I; Selçuk D; Akman C; Altuğ A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 17259846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Updated quality assurance self-assessment exercise in intraoral and panoramic radiography. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Radiology Practice Committee.
Goren AD; Lundeen RC; Deahl ST; Hashimoto K; Kapa SF; Katz JO; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Van Der Stelt PF; Wolfgang L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 10710465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of CT dose to the fetus and pregnant female patient using patient-specific computational models.
Xie T; Poletti PA; Platon A; Becker CD; Zaidi H
Eur Radiol; 2018 Mar; 28(3):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 28887589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current.
Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6084-92. PubMed ID: 22047373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT.
Tsiklakis K; Donta C; Gavala S; Karayianni K; Kamenopoulou V; Hourdakis CJ
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Dec; 56(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 15978765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
