BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26313308)

  • 21. Thyroid radiation dose during panoramic and cephalometric dental x-ray examinations.
    Block AJ; Goepp RA; Mason EW
    Angle Orthod; 1977 Jan; 47(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 264773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Updated quality assurance self-assessment exercise in intraoral and panoramic radiography. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Radiology Practice Committee.
    Goren AD; Lundeen RC; Deahl ST; Hashimoto K; Kapa SF; Katz JO; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Van Der Stelt PF; Wolfgang L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 10710465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Occupational and patients effective radiation doses in dental imaging.
    Tamam N; Almuqrin AH; Mansour S; Elnour A; Musa M; Omer H; Sulieman A; Bradley DA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2021 Nov; 177():109899. PubMed ID: 34438276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination.
    Welborn D; Lockwood P
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):360-365. PubMed ID: 35000868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiation protection in dental X-ray surgeries--still rooms for improvement.
    Hart G; Dugdale M
    Br Dent J; 2013 Mar; 214(6):E16. PubMed ID: 23519002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from panoramic radiography.
    Rottke D; Grossekettler L; Sawada K; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130302. PubMed ID: 24404601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of patient dose and image quality for cardiac CT with breast shields.
    Midgley SM; Einsiedel PF; Langenberg F; Lui EH; Heinze SB
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Sep; 151(3):463-8. PubMed ID: 22492837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of CT dose to the fetus and pregnant female patient using patient-specific computational models.
    Xie T; Poletti PA; Platon A; Becker CD; Zaidi H
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Mar; 28(3):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 28887589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of a new foetal shielding device for pregnant brain tumour patients.
    Kang S; Kim KH; Kang SW; Shin DS; Lee S; Chung JB
    Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):109. PubMed ID: 34120633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lead versus bismuth-antimony shield for fetal dose reduction at different gestational ages at CT pulmonary angiography.
    Chatterson LC; Leswick DA; Fladeland DA; Hunt MM; Webster ST
    Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):560-7. PubMed ID: 21555348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The image gently in dentistry campaign: partnering with parents to promote the responsible use of x-rays in pediatric dentistry.
    Law CS; Douglass JM; Farman AG; White SC; Zeller GG; Lurie AG; Goske MJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(7):458-9. PubMed ID: 25514072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography.
    Ekestubbe A; Thilander-Klang A; Lith A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 15313999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiation doses of commonly used dental radiographic surveys.
    Freeman JP; Brand JW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Mar; 77(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 8170662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiation dose to the thyroid gland and breast from multidetector computed tomography of the cervical spine: does bismuth shielding with and without a cervical collar reduce dose?
    Gunn ML; Kanal KM; Kolokythas O; Anzai Y
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):987-90. PubMed ID: 19940673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efficacy of lead foil for reducing doses in the head and neck: a simulation study using digital intraoral systems.
    Nejaim Y; Silva AI; Brasil DM; Vasconcelos KF; Haiter Neto F; Boscolo FN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150065. PubMed ID: 26084474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pediatric chest MDCT using tube current modulation: effect on radiation dose with breast shielding.
    Coursey C; Frush DP; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; Greenberg SB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):W54-61. PubMed ID: 18094273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Methods for monitoring patient dose in dental radiology.
    Helmrot E; Thilander-Klang A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):303-5. PubMed ID: 20223852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective doses in intraoral and panoramic dental radiology from dose-area product values.
    Looe HK; Eenboom F; Chofor N; Pfaffenberger A; Steinhoff M; Rühmann A; Poplawski A; Willborn K; Poppe B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 18550517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Review article: radiation protection in dental radiology.
    Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Nov; 67(803):1041-9. PubMed ID: 7820393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.