461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26313446)
1. Accuracy of Genomic Selection in a Rice Synthetic Population Developed for Recurrent Selection Breeding.
Grenier C; Cao TV; Ospina Y; Quintero C; Châtel MH; Tohme J; Courtois B; Ahmadi N
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136594. PubMed ID: 26313446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic prediction models for traits differing in heritability for soybean, rice, and maize.
Kaler AS; Purcell LC; Beissinger T; Gillman JD
BMC Plant Biol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):87. PubMed ID: 35219296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic selection and association mapping in rice (Oryza sativa): effect of trait genetic architecture, training population composition, marker number and statistical model on accuracy of rice genomic selection in elite, tropical rice breeding lines.
Spindel J; Begum H; Akdemir D; Virk P; Collard B; Redoña E; Atlin G; Jannink JL; McCouch SR
PLoS Genet; 2015 Feb; 11(2):e1004982. PubMed ID: 25689273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rice diversity panel provides accurate genomic predictions for complex traits in the progenies of biparental crosses involving members of the panel.
Ben Hassen M; Cao TV; Bartholomé J; Orasen G; Colombi C; Rakotomalala J; Razafinimpiasa L; Bertone C; Biselli C; Volante A; Desiderio F; Jacquin L; Valè G; Ahmadi N
Theor Appl Genet; 2018 Feb; 131(2):417-435. PubMed ID: 29138904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using selection index theory to estimate consistency of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium across populations.
Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP
BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 26187501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors affecting the accuracy of genomic selection for growth and wood quality traits in an advanced-breeding population of black spruce (Picea mariana).
Lenz PRN; Beaulieu J; Mansfield SD; Clément S; Desponts M; Bousquet J
BMC Genomics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):335. PubMed ID: 28454519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of QTL minor allele frequency on genomic evaluation using real genotype data and simulated phenotypes in Japanese Black cattle.
Uemoto Y; Sasaki S; Kojima T; Sugimoto Y; Watanabe T
BMC Genet; 2015 Nov; 16():134. PubMed ID: 26586567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
Muir WM
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effective Genomic Selection in a Narrow-Genepool Crop with Low-Density Markers: Asian Rapeseed as an Example.
Werner CR; Voss-Fels KP; Miller CN; Qian W; Hua W; Guan CY; Snowdon RJ; Qian L
Plant Genome; 2018 Jul; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 30025015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic Prediction for Grain Yield and Yield-Related Traits in Chinese Winter Wheat.
Ali M; Zhang Y; Rasheed A; Wang J; Zhang L
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Feb; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 32079240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of genomic prediction within and across generations in maritime pine.
Bartholomé J; Van Heerwaarden J; Isik F; Boury C; Vidal M; Plomion C; Bouffier L
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):604. PubMed ID: 27515254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic Prediction Accounting for Genotype by Environment Interaction Offers an Effective Framework for Breeding Simultaneously for Adaptation to an Abiotic Stress and Performance Under Normal Cropping Conditions in Rice.
Ben Hassen M; Bartholomé J; Valè G; Cao TV; Ahmadi N
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Jul; 8(7):2319-2332. PubMed ID: 29743189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in Synthetic Populations Depending on the Number of Parents, Relatedness, and Ancestral Linkage Disequilibrium.
Schopp P; Müller D; Technow F; Melchinger AE
Genetics; 2017 Jan; 205(1):441-454. PubMed ID: 28049710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genome-wide association study, genomic prediction and marker-assisted selection for seed weight in soybean (Glycine max).
Zhang J; Song Q; Cregan PB; Jiang GL
Theor Appl Genet; 2016 Jan; 129(1):117-30. PubMed ID: 26518570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of genomic selection for alfalfa biomass yield in different reference populations.
Annicchiarico P; Nazzicari N; Li X; Wei Y; Pecetti L; Brummer EC
BMC Genomics; 2015 Dec; 16():1020. PubMed ID: 26626170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing Training Population Data and Validation of Genomic Selection for Economic Traits in Soft Winter Wheat.
Hoffstetter A; Cabrera A; Huang M; Sneller C
G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Sep; 6(9):2919-28. PubMed ID: 27440921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of genomic selection training populations with a genetic algorithm.
Akdemir D; Sanchez JI; Jannink JL
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 May; 47(1):38. PubMed ID: 25943105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic Gain and Inbreeding from Genomic Selection in a Simulated Commercial Breeding Program for Perennial Ryegrass.
Lin Z; Cogan NO; Pembleton LW; Spangenberg GC; Forster JW; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
Plant Genome; 2016 Mar; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 27898764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selection of trait-specific markers and multi-environment models improve genomic predictive ability in rice.
Bhandari A; Bartholomé J; Cao-Hamadoun TV; Kumari N; Frouin J; Kumar A; Ahmadi N
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0208871. PubMed ID: 31059529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
