These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26313885)
1. Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range. Wei H; Dibb R; Zhou Y; Sun Y; Xu J; Wang N; Liu C NMR Biomed; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1294-303. PubMed ID: 26313885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping. Li W; Wang N; Yu F; Han H; Cao W; Romero R; Tantiwongkosi B; Duong TQ; Liu C Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():111-22. PubMed ID: 25536496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. QSMxT: Robust masking and artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Stewart AW; Robinson SD; O'Brien K; Jin J; Widhalm G; Hangel G; Walls A; Goodwin J; Eckstein K; Tourell M; Morgan C; Narayanan A; Barth M; Bollmann S Magn Reson Med; 2022 Mar; 87(3):1289-1300. PubMed ID: 34687073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technical Note: Optimization of quantitative susceptibility mapping by streaking artifact detection. Wu ML; Wang CK; Lin PY; Chao TC Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5715-5722. PubMed ID: 32945538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhancing k-space quantitative susceptibility mapping by enforcing consistency on the cone data (CCD) with structural priors. Wen Y; Wang Y; Liu T Magn Reson Med; 2016 Feb; 75(2):823-30. PubMed ID: 25752805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Algorithms: Mathematical Rationale and Computational Implementations. Kee Y; Liu Z; Zhou L; Dimov A; Cho J; de Rochefort L; Seo JK; Wang Y IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2531-2545. PubMed ID: 28885147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A modulated closed form solution for quantitative susceptibility mapping--a thorough evaluation and comparison to iterative methods based on edge prior knowledge. Khabipova D; Wiaux Y; Gruetter R; Marques JP Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():163-174. PubMed ID: 25463463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preconditioned total field inversion (TFI) method for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Liu Z; Kee Y; Zhou D; Wang Y; Spincemaille P Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jul; 78(1):303-315. PubMed ID: 27464893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Background field removal technique based on non-regularized variable kernels sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Kan H; Arai N; Takizawa M; Omori K; Kasai H; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():94-101. PubMed ID: 29902566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain. Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Streaking artifact suppression of quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstructions via L1-norm data fidelity optimization (L1-QSM). Milovic C; Lambert M; Langkammer C; Bredies K; Irarrazaval P; Tejos C Magn Reson Med; 2022 Jan; 87(1):457-473. PubMed ID: 34350634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain. Schweser F; Sommer K; Deistung A; Reichenbach JR Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):2083-100. PubMed ID: 22659482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]